SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Vosilla who wrote (28666)3/15/2005 4:08:53 PM
From: ild  Respond to of 110194
 
I agree. I do. -g-

The Fed has been holding real Funds rate deeply negative to jump start the US economy. The result -- speculation using cheap money all over the world and huge buildup in China.



To: John Vosilla who wrote (28666)3/15/2005 4:13:32 PM
From: dpl  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
The market back then was in a bubble.In a bubble the "real" interest rate means nothing.All that matters is what interest rate will prick the bubble.Most of the time when the yield curve inverts you get a bear market.The Fed inverted in the spring of 2000.Since the market was the most over priced,and more important over owned in history, you got a big bear.

S&P -50%
Tech -80%

We have the same situation now.Real rates mean nothing.What is important is what rate will prick the RE bubble.



To: John Vosilla who wrote (28666)3/15/2005 6:40:27 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
7-8% sounds about right...but there's a wide variance. I suspect it's less for those with higher incomes, who "consume" a lower proportion of their income on niceties like food, gasoline and medicine, and more on necessities like HDTV and Ipods.....Bully!<G>