Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (224238)	3/16/2005 12:42:00 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574005

The point is that most of the liberals on this board, including you, have advocated sex amongst 13 year olds. I've made my point clear numerous times, and it is that in general more healthy sex is better than less. At what age this should begin and what constitutes "healthy" sex are separate but related issues. That's a clear and simple sentence for you to study to understand MY view. YOU are the one arguing against the straw man who is advocating 13 year olds SHOULD have sex. I've said to your repeatedly that NO ONE is on the other side of your view that they should not. Can't you read? It is a bizarre position that you and the other liberals have taken here tonight. Huh? It's 930am where I am, so quit drinking! And what does sexual activity have to do with liberal versus conservative (political terms)? And I think it the reason the Democrat party is near death. You think the Democratic party is near death because a non-existant liberal straw man says 12 year olds should have sex? If you get a chance to say that in a public forum, I recommend you not do so. It appears you are ranking high in the list of examples of "board overrun with idiots"....

To: i-node who wrote (224238)	3/16/2005 3:27:48 AM
From: 10K a day	Respond to of 1574005

if u think thats a bizarre position u should see this one...

To: i-node who wrote (224238)	3/16/2005 3:59:59 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574005

The point is that most of the liberals on this board, including you, have advocated sex amongst 13 year olds. You'll recall the following exchange: Me: "Responsible adults comprehend that 13 year-olds do not need to be engaging in sexual activity. 13 year-olds most assuredly want it for themselves, but that doesn't mean it is sensible or appropriate behavior." You: "Why should young boys be able to wrestle with each other, but young boy and girls not be able to engage in healthy sexual activity with each other?" You are the one that brought up the age 13, my question could apply to any young people - I consider 19 years olds pretty young. And I went back and reread ALL the related exchanges, and I can't find one single post where anyone, liberal or not, advocates sex among 13 year olds. There are plenty of posts where you argue (against NO ONE) that sex is inappropriate for 13 year olds, but there is no one on the other side of that argument. There is some discussion of the matter, but there is never a post by ANYONE that says "13 years olds should be having sex". It is a bizarre position that you and the other liberals have taken here tonight. And I think it the reason the Democrat party is near death. Which brings to mind the question, how did you conclude that the advocates of sex amongst 13 year olds (which don't seem to exist) are bringing the Democratic party to its death?

To: i-node who wrote (224238)	3/16/2005 4:26:48 AM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574005

David, RE: "It is a bizarre position that you and the other liberals have taken here tonight." What's bizarre is that you would actually think liberals think this. Regards, Amy J