SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (224317)3/16/2005 10:15:12 AM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573924
 
re: And here we are 25 years later, the fund is still broke.

It's not broke. But it would be pretty quick under the Bush proposal.

John



To: i-node who wrote (224317)3/16/2005 12:00:21 PM
From: SilentZ  Respond to of 1573924
 
>And here we are 25 years later, the fund is still broke.

The fund is in better shape than nearly every other government system.

>It is in your interest to learn something about the subject.

This is about ideology, not knowledge.

-Z



To: i-node who wrote (224317)3/16/2005 2:41:55 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573924
 
BS. Simple economics would say it can -- it's just a matter of what that amount is and if people are willing to pay it.

You do not understand the problem. At all.

If the massive tax increases (and they were massive by any measure) of the early 80s (and actually of the 70s before that) didn't solve the problem, it cannot be solved with tax increases.

The tax increases of 25 years ago were staggering. And here we are 25 years later, the fund is still broke.

You are talking about a subject you know zero about. It is in your interest to learn something about the subject.


BS. You have become an SS Casandra. We all have seen the numbers. It can be corrected by revamping the financial structure of the program. So move on to a new topic.......like why the GOP is doomed to failure!