SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (28256)3/17/2005 8:38:56 AM
From: microhoogle!Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Analysts expect housing market to slow; some fear bursting `bubble'

By Kevin G. Hall, Knight Ridder Newspapers

WASHINGTON - The U.S. housing market finally appears headed for a slowdown after four years of spectacular growth that's raised widespread fears of a real estate "bubble."

Knight Ridder Special Report (at philly.com)


Because rising short-term interest rates and worries about inflation are driving up the price of home mortgages nationwide, home sales are expected to slow, and prices in some markets could even fall.

Economists differ over how much sales may drop. Optimists expect the growth in sales to level off from phenomenal recent peaks. Pessimists warn that many metropolitan markets may see bursts of housing "bubbles" - markets in which speculative investment drove prices higher than usual demand can sustain - similar to the collapse of the high-tech stock-market bubble in the late 1990s.

Although mortgage rates remain relatively low, they're rising, and that's fueling the debate. The benchmark 30-year fixed mortgage rate crept up to a seven-month high of 5.85 percent March 10, up from 5.34 percent a year earlier. The one-year adjustable-rate mortgage, popular with investors who purchase homes to resell quickly, is around 4.24 percent, up from 3.20 percent the year before.

Most experts agree that a slowdown is overdue. The Federal Reserve (news - web sites) has raised short-term lending rates by 1.5 percentage points in six quarter-point moves since last June, but long-term rates were slow to follow until recently.

Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan (news - web sites) has made it clear that more short-term rate increases are coming, and higher mortgage rates are expected to follow. Freddie Mac, one of two federal housing-finance agencies, predicts a 30-year fixed mortgage rate of 6.25 percent by year's end.

That should curb the rise in home prices, which surged a spectacular 11.2 percent last year, the fastest rate since 1979, according to the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, which regulates Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, the nation's largest supplier of home mortgage funds. Nationally, home prices have risen 8.4 percent annually over the last five years; 20 percent or more annually in high-price areas around major cities from Washington to San Francisco.

Sales of new and existing homes have broken records for four consecutive years. Yale University economist Robert Shiller said the only similar housing boom in U.S. history was when GIs returned home from World War II, lifting a depressed market. He's the author of "Irrational Exuberance," the 2000 best-selling book about the '90s stock-market bubble. Its latest edition includes a chapter on the current real-estate trend.

About the postwar housing precedent, he said: "It wasn't a bubble, it was a surge in real demand." He thinks the current boom is a "classic bubble" because people keep buying houses they know are too expensive because they expect prices to rise even higher.

Economists in the optimist camp think that a growing economy, and an influx of new buyers as the "echo boom" generation enters the market, will keep home prices rising, albeit more slowly. They expect mortgages to remain affordable.

"We are expecting 6.5 percent by midyear, which is low in a historical context," said Celia Chen, the director of housing economics for Economy.Com, a business consultancy. "I think for the most part we will see a soft landing nationally. We don't anticipate a decline in house prices on a national average."

Other economists take a more dour view, but stop short of predicting havoc.

"I do think it is going to weaken over the next year as interest rates go up. Owning is going to look more expensive relative to renting," predicted Jan Hatzius, a senior economist at Goldman Sachs investment bank in New York. "The key really is what happens to interest rates."

Said Michael Carliner, an economist with the National Association of Home Builders in Washington: "Going up to 6.5 percent will have a calming effect (on home prices and sales), but it is not going to create a housing slump. Any rate increase beyond that will have a disproportional effect."

Pessimists think the nation's hottest real-estate markets are in a bubble driven by unbridled speculative investment. Anecdotal evidence abounds. Outside Washington, young professionals camp out overnight for a chance to bid on new homes. In South Florida, new homes and condos can sell two or three times before they're even built.

In late February, a National Association of Realtors report provided stunning confirmation that speculation in housing is soaring. The group said 23 percent of homes purchased last year were bought as investments or second homes. The report suggested that many people are buying homes for quick turnarounds, much as they'd plunk money into rising stocks.

On March 7, David Berson, the chief economist for Fannie Mae, the nation's largest supplier of home mortgage funds, observed in his weekly commentary that investor ownership of housing hasn't been this high since the late 1980s, which led to a crash in housing prices.

"Many analysts think that a high investor share in the Northeast and California helped exacerbate the housing downturn that happened during the 1990-1991 recession," he wrote, noting that home prices stayed depressed well beyond the recession's end.

Berson suggested it could happen again because "the risk of regional home price declines is higher" as so many purchases are by speculators rather than residents.

James Stack, the president of Montana-based Investech Research, warned of a stock-market bubble in the late 1990s and now expects the worst for housing.

"Bubbles do not pop simply because the prices get too high. It takes an external event to start to let the air out of that bubble, and in many cases that comes from central bank policy, raising interest rates," Stack said. "If we were to see long-term rates rise by over a percentage point, then you are going to see a toll starting to be taken in real estate."

The average real estate cycle is roughly twice as long as a stock market cycle, Stack said. That means that a bursting bubble wouldn't be felt immediately, but would be felt longer, probably for about eight years.

"I wouldn't feel so strongly about real estate being at a risky stage if not for what we are seeing in the Flathead Valley" of Montana, he said. There, dozens of $4 million vacation homes are being built on 5-acre parcels. "Ten years ago, a $4 million home would not have sold in an entire year. How crazy is that?"

tinyurl.com



To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (28256)3/17/2005 12:23:35 PM
From: John VosillaRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 306849
 
In the 1970's we did have high inflation and a decline in the dollar. We also had rising wages, rents and interest rates which so far is not the case today. Back then we also had two severe downturns in the real estate market. All of this has to end real bad. The longer the inevitable is delayed the worse it will be. Tighter underwriting standards and interest rates back to historical norms is all it would take to knock SoCal prices down 30-40%.

What do you make of the oil patch still not participating even with energy prices at record levels? Texas was the biggest of housing bubbles by 1984 so perhaps the midwest markets could partially offset the coastal collapse this time out?



To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (28256)3/18/2005 3:59:35 AM
From: Amy JRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 306849
 
RE: "if the devaluation leads to increased exports and lessened imports - of which there is not yet any indication."

I think companies are seeing increased exports.

Regards,
Amy J