Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: redfish who wrote (98444)	3/17/2005 2:22:56 PM
From: Grainne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

I have read every single word of every link you hae published here, as far as I can tell. I know you are friends with the judge, and this is probably personal to you. However, you also probably should remember that you live in Florida where it is discussed and written about constantly, and not everyone does, so our learning curves might be different. Also, even though you have a particular opinion, the article I posted raises another one, and I think personally that debate is healthy. I was curious about the medical experts for the other side, because some of them seem to be prominent and are definitely board certified. I wondered how such divergent medical opinions could exist. You could have just ignored my post, which I believe I gave you the option to do when I wrote mine. If you consider arguing a waste of time, perhaps jumping into a discussion of this case wasn't such a good strategy for you. However, it really wasn't my intent to argue, but to explore the contradictory medical testimony.