Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jttmab who wrote (39396)	3/17/2005 12:58:41 PM
From: Srexley	Respond to of 173976

"That has nothing to do with what I was responding to. Get it right or don't bother" Maybe you should explain then. That you don't is pretty telling. "You are about as ignorant of a human being that I've ever come across." 135 iq. Not that I'm brilliant. But if I am as "ignorant of a human being" as you have ever seen, you hang with some smart folks. Based on your position that nothing is killed in an abortion, I think you might want to re-asses. All comes down to you think you are sooooooo smart that you should be able to tell others what to think and how to live. I don't buy it. Not for a minute. I just have a different opinion than you, and that bugs the heck out of you. So you lie about me. "You repeatedly contradict yourself, misrepresent and have nothing of any substance to offer." These posts go pretty quickly so I won't say I have never contradicted myself. But to say I repeatedly do is a lie. Especially with no examples. If you give me one, I will gladly explain it to you. I make mistakes sometimes. "The best you can do is parrot short phrases that you picked up from someone else" Another common tactic from the left. Name calling is not an argument. Either is lying. Something you are doing right in the sentence I am replying too. And no expamles of my "contradictions". "There's no indication that you know anything about France either." In France you are guilty until proven innocent. That is all I have said about France, and it is true. Again, no example, just an attack. Note that in France they can pick you up for no reason, and you have to convince them of innocence. Just the opposite of this fine country. Wrong too, imo. "That is not the justice system in the United States" I am afraid you are mistaken about when you can legally kill someone. I have had some training in this area, and if you kill someone because you "think" you were in danger, but really were not (and I mean grave danger), you will go to jail. The exception is that SOME states allow you to kill an intruder IF he/she broke into your house. That means all windows and doors were locked, and he/she forced their way in. And the garage doesn't count. If you left the door unlocked or open and they came in without breaking an entry then you are back to having to PROVE you were in grave danger. Simple as that. If you want to ignore this, or call me an idiot for knowing this, fine. Says a lot about you. Maybe I misunderstood your statement about being able to kill when you only "think" you are in danger. Please explain if that is the case. And you may want to re-look at the innocent until proven guilty in France. You are wrong here, and calling me an idiot for being right makes you look silly.