Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (224889)	3/19/2005 2:59:30 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1571806

>That part of the sentence is truly bizarre IMO. If an unborn baby, a fetus, can be murdered, of course abortion is equal to murder. But since that is not the case according to current US laws, giving him the needle for double murder when in fact one was "nothing more" than terminating a pregnancy, is truly bizarre. Pick one, trying to have it both ways is utter nonsense. In fact, I would suggest your conclusion is what is truly bizarre. Laci P. wanted the kid. She did not want an abortion. By murdering her, he murdered the kid......against her wishes. She was near full term. She was healthy. This had nothing to do with the issues surrounding abortions. It had to do with a little known phenomenon in this country...........men, particularly weak men, freak out when women get pregnant. In this country, I believe the most likely cause of death of a pregnant woman is by her husband. Scott P. has been diagnosed a sociopath........he was the most likely type to harm his wife during pregnancy. No one knew that he was a sociopath because sociopaths are so nice.....normal seeming. That's the point... it's a foot in the door to overturn Roe v. Wade... I don't think so. ted