Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Amy J who wrote (224892)	3/18/2005 8:20:22 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572208

Amy, It could explain why he didn't divorce her - he would have lost the million. You tell me, why this is legal when polygamy certainly isn't? Beats me. The way I see it, pulling the feeding tube is the same thing as pulling the trigger. Or strangling or smothering her, like what Scott must have done to Laci. What was the malpractice case about? Spooky case. Ironically, the malpractice was the reason why she's in her current physical state. He sues on behalf of his wife, he wins, and now he wants the money that he "won for his wife." Tenchusatsu

To: Amy J who wrote (224892)	3/19/2005 3:19:44 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572208

Wow, that is really, really sad if he was after her money. It could explain why he didn't divorce her - he would have lost the million. You tell me, why this is legal when polygamy certainly isn't? This is actually worse than polygamy. Warning.......you are getting the conservative side of the story. I thought the same until I read the facts. Court case after court case has sided with the husband. Its most likely red state politics that is causing the problems. ted