Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Gold and Silver Stocks and Related Commentary -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bruce Robbins who wrote (9063)	3/19/2005 9:51:01 AM
From: loantech	Respond to of 18308

Bruce, I am listening to it now. Thanks. Paul VE did say he thinks Junior U stocks are pretty frothy. Will see what else. Tom

To: Bruce Robbins who wrote (9063)	3/19/2005 10:40:40 AM
From: loantech	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 18308

Bruce, Excellent program. FGX mentioned 26 minutes in. One Uranium stock was mentioned as a spec Bitterroot Resources. A few other gold specs sounded interesting Almaden Gold, Miranda Gold, Bravo Ventures (very interesting). Tom

To: Bruce Robbins who wrote (9063)	3/19/2005 10:50:54 AM
From: tyc:>	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18308

Thanks for that, Bruce. There was an interesting section talking about the value of due-diligence performed by a major. One of my stocks has Noranda to do its due diligence; it is very frustrating to hear only "The exploration ventures have found nothing of economic significance". But really, that's the VALUE of major-company due diligence.... perhaps as a shareholder i should be grateful for it. How many ventures do we get excited about that a major would simply dismiss as "nothing of economic significance" ?

To: Bruce Robbins who wrote (9063)	3/19/2005 11:01:24 AM
From: loantech	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18308

Bruce, Interesting idea. DAE is finding gold in rock. Therefore the results from the rock assays from recent trenching may very well tell the story of what gold they may find by drilling. Is this any more true for trenching that is done in rock vs soil? tom

To: Bruce Robbins who wrote (9063)	3/19/2005 12:05:51 PM
From: Zincman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18308

B: Will you post the original link. My Real Player will not play the section. Is it a WindowsMedia file? TIA,

To: Bruce Robbins who wrote (9063)	3/19/2005 5:40:43 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 18308

I really liked the part when Rick Rule talks about malinvestment in the industry. This is so true and is why we have seen so much dilution in most juniors. That is why I think Chesapeake is among the very few companies that will succeed. They are sitting today on a group of excellent properties, close to a discovery. They have been there for almost 3 years, started with $26M inm the bank and still have almost $26M in the bank. You can't beat CKG in terms of well managed exploration company. I also agree with Bishop and his comments on Cardero. Cardero is similar to Chesapeake in that sense. But not as good as CKG. None of these folks seems to be aware of Chesapeake. I hope they will be proved to have been wrong in a not too distant future.