Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (104977)	3/19/2005 7:33:00 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793807

Now, you may opine that in this particular case, this particular woman has not been deprived of life without due process of law, but that's another issue entirely. That doesn't make the law unconstitutional. If you find something unconstitutional about the Florida law, please lay it out for me. Otherwise the question is only whether the due legal process specified in the law was adhered to in this case. I'm getting whiplash from all this hopping from the general to the specific and back again. It matters whether the problem to be fixed is the law or whether there was something hinky about this particular case. Is your issue with the law or the case? If it's the case, as this post suggests, how does your earlier concern about the majority play?