SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Eashoa' M'sheekha who wrote (159338)3/20/2005 5:02:48 PM
From: marcos  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
'Israeli forces concentrated on the border with Egypt included 3 divisions, which consisted of 9 brigades, of which 5 were armored; there were also three reserve brigades. The Egyptian forces consisted of 7 divisions, five of them infantry and two armored. Four infantry divisions were near the Egyptian-Israeli border in the Sinai, an infantry and an armored division in central Sinai, and a second armored division in the west. In addition, a reinforced brigade (with 200 tanks) under Colonel Shazly was deployed in the southern Sinai with orders to encircle Eilat in the case of war.
Overall, Egypt had over 100,000 troops and 1,000 tanks in the Sinai, backed by appropriate artillery. This arrangement was based on the Soviet doctrine, where mobile armor units at strategic depth provide a dynamic defense while infantry units engage in defensive battles.'

en.wikipedia.org

Can you imagine the logistics of supplying eight times such a force, the most part of a million men, with water alone, in the Sinai desert? ... not too likely for a not-so-rich country like Egypt, eh .... ah, but history is written by the victors, as they say

Note that the 1967 conflict was fought entirely on arab muslim land, and not at all on the six point something per cent of Palestine legitimately acquired by zionists pre-1948 ..... this was also true of the 1956 conflict, the 1973 conflict, and almost entirely the case in the 1948 war



To: Eashoa' M'sheekha who wrote (159338)3/20/2005 5:29:33 PM
From: Ish  Respond to of 281500
 
<<For once why don't you stop trying to re-write history on this thread...you might begin to get some respect from your fellow SI'ers......maybe...>>

I think Nadine is usually more on the money than most of the posters on SI.