Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cnyndwllr who wrote (159373)	3/21/2005 12:01:44 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

His post was a good post Ed but because its good doesnt mean he is 100% right. Yes in retrospect my answer on iraq attack would be no, but more for the reasons that post-war our policy was not good policy and less about the reasons for going to war which i think were there. Do you think post-war that anything we might have tried was doomed from the start to be as difficult as this has been? I am heartened now that even front page NYTimes today has an article that things are getting better in iraq. It doesnt strike me that this will end like vietnam any longer. There are solutions now that are less bad than what we thought might exist even just a few short months ago. Has your prediction about when i would change my view, timed out yet? Mike