Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (225592)	3/22/2005 3:38:18 AM
From: Elroy	Respond to of 1572142

I just remember thinking at the time that a guy who fervently believes in a religion that permits (or even insists upon) polygamy ought to be able to practice his religion without government interference. There was an issue that one of the wives was only (dare I say it?) 13 when they were married. You've gotta be kidding. Now YOU'RE advocating it's OK to have sex with 13 year olds (when you are perhaps....53?) if your religion says it's OK? Whatever....

To: i-node who wrote (225592)	3/23/2005 4:56:17 AM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572142

David, RE: "I just remember thinking at the time that a guy who fervently believes in a religion that permits (or even insists upon) polygamy ought to be able to ....one of the wives was only (dare I say it?) 13 when they were married. I don't know. Just struck me as strange a person couldn't do that if they chose to." ------------------- Yeesh. Weren't you the same person that believed sex at 13 was bad - what happened to your ethics on that? It's amazing how people feel it's okay to act bad, under a so-called 'religion.' Amy J