Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (105326)	3/22/2005 8:31:59 AM
From: gamesmistress	Respond to of 793883

This will be an interesting test of how much times have changed. Charles may find, as did Edward VIII, that if your mistress is not acceptable as Queen, you have to choose between her and the throne (unless they simply forgo getting married, or the law is changed). As for that business about Camilla being "Duchess of Cornwall" and then "Princess Consort", it did sound like Charles was reverting to the morganatic habits of his German ancestors, but it's clear there is no basis in British law for it.