Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Natural Resource Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Roebear who wrote (23030)	3/22/2005 9:14:14 AM
From: isopatch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108567

Agree Roebear. Yesterday was a rough one for the perma bulls heavily invested in the PMs awa some of the small energy stocks. As we've seen many times before, those with large losses sometimes show up on other threads with a chip on their shoulder amplified made even larger by a bottle of Jim Bean. People who can't handle the risks of market with a cool head shouldn't be investing. In any case, they won't be posting here. Isopatch

To: Roebear who wrote (23030)	3/22/2005 1:21:29 PM
From: c.hinton	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108567

I can be argued,but not proved ,that Saudi Arabia conspired with the US to flood the market with oil thus denying russia of much needed oil revenues at a criticle moment....the out come was the collapse of the soviet economy.....intentionally or not. With regard to china same game in reverse is not all together out of the question. For those who find it hard to believe america could be so clever, look to George Kennans x paper published annonomously in Foriegn Policy nearly 45 years ago.