Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (16080)	3/22/2005 4:33:40 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander	Respond to of 20773

"as you spin it" Do you think he was greater, or the greatest?? prwatch.org Poor guy, married into the Freud Tribe.. And then he got these funny tasks, below the border.. (however, he did better north of the border) Btw, it is sad that the increasing numbers of US autistics just spin and spin any object. Specifically sad when in gets into vaccination, preservatives and major CIA senators. (not Bush I, I think he has not said anything, publicly, on the issue of having all vaccinations as fast as possible) Burpton?? Btw, what is he up too these days?? ..

To: Sully- who wrote (16080)	3/22/2005 4:50:04 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander	Respond to of 20773

"as you spin it", wow, halleluja, that too is still available. booknotes.org To watch, read or spin... Well, so is almost all of C-SPAN booknotes, and they are working to internet-archive that which they missed earlier. Unluckily, the Lipstadt lecture will not, ever nor never, reach that level.. PS I have always been fascinated by the shrunken intimate size of those consuming those Chiquita bananas: "A masterfully-orchestrated, secretive campaign to help overthrow the leftist government of Guatemala in the 1950s. The beneficiary: The United Fruit Company, a Bernays client whose banana republic was threatened by a socialist regime." Who is that american guy in Iraq, did he get the same early brain damages?? c-span.org

To: Sully- who wrote (16080)	3/24/2005 8:12:26 AM
From: zonder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

Just answer the question, for God's sake. And stop the ad hominem crap. I have no "faith" whatsoever, and cannot possibly be "partisan" as a non-American who does not care one bit for either of your funny political parties. That you should insist on such baseless allegations rather than sticking to the topic undermines the impression you wish to convey of a rational and civil person who talks only on facts. We are talking about a single case of a Canadian taken to Syria by Americans and jailed there. You don't contest the validity of this story, so you DON'T need "evidence" to answer the following questions: (1) How is abducting a Canadian citizen and dumping him in a Syrian jail "lawful"? While answering that question, you keep in mind the "UN convention against torture" which US signed in 1980s, where this paragraph appears: Article 3 1. No State Party shall expel, return ("refouler") or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture. (2) You say "we don't know for sure that US meant these people to be tortured in Syria and elsewhere". Fair enough. Now tell us: What other reason can you possibly think of for US to send a suspected Canadian off to Syria, in of the Convention above? Be a man. Answer two simple questions.