Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (105384)	3/22/2005 1:37:02 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793775

But it's all been "asked and answered," in court. I'd agree with you, but for the fact that Congress granted her and her parents the right to a trial de novo. Apparently they did not grasp what a boon had been granted them. Very unusual to get two bites of the judicial apple.

To: LindyBill who wrote (105384)	3/22/2005 1:55:12 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Respond to of 793775

This whole case exists because of a misleading video clip. false. i think this case could be brought to a final conclusion if mr. schiavo would allow for example an MRI or even a swallow test, something she has been denied once he went down the path of terminating her life, because according to him, she would not want to 'live this way' (of course how she lives has everything in the world to do with his instructions as to her care, initial order to insert a feeding tube as opposed to hand feeding for example, creating a self fulfilling prophecy) i believe a court should take a realistic look at his standing as her guardian, considering he now has a common law wife, children, married in name only, and the continued existence of terri schiavo does not play well toward his future goals. and i also do not believe for one minute that her family wants her to suffer. my take is that they want to do everything possible to restore her to maximum state of health possible under the circumstances. and mr. schiavo has been denying her that right consistently (after the insurance settlement) for years