SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (159444)3/22/2005 8:06:56 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
You on the other hand think that Rumsfeld was right in using 130,000 troops.

I stated no judgement about whether or not he was right.

Tim



To: Orcastraiter who wrote (159444)3/23/2005 6:11:08 AM
From: Ish  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
<<We'll just have to agree to disagree on this matter. I believe the appropriate force size for the attack and occupation would have been around 400,000 US troops>>

Since Clinton cut back our military we don't have 400k troops to deploy. It looks like we need to fire up the draft again to keep you happy.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News