Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wayners who wrote (676472)	3/22/2005 9:32:51 PM
From: Krowbar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

< Look at the Taliban. They had no WMD. They weren't Al Quaida and look what happened to them. There was no oil in Afghanistan either. No complaints???? > I was in favor of the invasion of Afghanistan, because that is where Al Quaida, led by bin Laden, was located. The Taliban, the radical Muslims who ruled Afghanistan, provided refuge for Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaeda organization, and allowed terrorist organizations to run training camps in their territory and, from 1994 to at least 2001. Bin Laden and his Al Quaida have claimed responsibility for 9/11, and all of the evidence points to them, NOT Saddam. They did not need WMD to take down the WTC, only suicide bombers with box cutters, and a Bush administration that was asleep at the wheel, despite being warned about Bin Laden by the outgoing Clinton administration. The lack of oil in Afghanistan is irrelevant. Thems the facts as best as I can find them. If you want to believe the fantasy that Saddam was responsible for 9/11 like Cyberken and all of the FAUX news, Hannity, and Rush educated parrots, you have that right, I guess. Del