Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SirVinny who wrote (676486)	3/23/2005 12:06:26 AM
From: Mr. Palau	Respond to of 769670

Ultimately, I think the federal courts will not change the result reached by the 19 state judges who have scrutinized this case more than any similar case in the history of the republic. But the court will probably act to preserve its ability to ensure that it gets it right. And if my wife was in her position, I wouldn't let photograhpers snapping her picture either.

To: SirVinny who wrote (676486)	3/23/2005 10:32:14 AM
From: Proud_Infidel	Respond to of 769670

Re: If anyone should have the right to decide it should be her parents. They have shown genuine love for her by sticking by her side during all these years. Agree on that 100%. Re: Did you ever ask yourself why the husband refuses any pictures be taken of the wife? I have read that he has been separated from her for 10 years and has been living with someone else. Would partly explain (to me atleast) why the wishes of the parents and the "husband" diverge as they do.