SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (105622)3/23/2005 2:40:37 PM
From: jrhana  Respond to of 793775
 
MRI could only show more pathology not less pathology.

This is on of the few public pronouncements that actually makes sense:

Message 21162275



To: Ilaine who wrote (105622)3/23/2005 2:45:26 PM
From: Lane3  Respond to of 793775
 
Yes, it was from a CAT scan that they determined her brain was mush, according to what I've read.



To: Ilaine who wrote (105622)3/23/2005 2:49:18 PM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793775
 
I don't know what possible functional or structural difference it makes that she has not had an MRI but has undergone CT scans. If her cortex has been turned into fluid as the documentation I've read suggests, either test is adequate.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News