SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hope Praytochange who wrote (676661)3/24/2005 11:59:48 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Respond to of 769670
 
Report Says Medicare Is in Poor Fiscal Shape

March 24, 2005
By DAVID E. ROSENBAUM

WASHINGTON, March 23 - The long-term financial condition of the Social Security system deteriorated slightly over the last year, the government reported on Wednesday, and President Bush's supporters immediately said this strengthened the case for enacting a fundamental change in the program this year.

In their annual report to Congress, the trustees of the Social Security and Medicare programs said Social Security reserves would be depleted in 2041, one year earlier than was projected last year. But the trustees emphasized, as they did last year, that Medicare's financial outlook was "much worse than Social Security's" and predicted that the monthly Medicare premiums paid by almost all Americans 65 and older would rise by 12 percent next year after a 17 percent increase this year.

The trustees said they saw a small improvement in the condition of Medicare's hospital insurance trust fund. They forecast that it would be depleted in 2020, one year later than was predicted last year.

...On Medicare, the trustees' report emphasizes that the health insurance program's "financial difficulties come sooner - and are much more severe - than those confronting Social Security."

Social Security and Medicare face "essentially the same demographic challenge," it says, but health costs are rising faster than the wages on which Social Security benefits are based. The trustees predicted that "Medicare's cost will first exceed Social Security's in 2024" and will then grow rapidly as a share of the nation's economy.

The basic monthly Medicare premium, withheld from Social Security checks, has risen 33 percent in the last two years, to the current $78.20 from $58.70 in 2003. The trustees said that beneficiaries faced another double-digit percentage increase in 2006, with the charge rising to $87.70.

That does not include a separate premium, expected to average $35 a month, for the prescription drug coverage that becomes available in 2006.

The premium increases could inject a new variable into what is expected to be a fiercely competitive midterm election year. "Many seniors are going to be facing sticker shock in terms of the cost of their health care," said John C. Rother, policy director of AARP.

...Medicare's problems are far more complicated than Social Security's because they depend not just on demographic changes but also on rising health costs, fueled by new medical technology and other factors....

nytimes.com

Edmund L. Andrews, Robert Pear, Richard W. Stevenson and Robin Toner contributed reporting for this article.

Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company


[Parenthetical observations (assuming current demographic and debt trends continue):

1) Medicare costs are projected to *exceed* SS costs by 2024.

2) CATO projects that by 2030 *interest* on the national debt alone will COST MORE annually then EITHER Medicare or SS.

3) By 2042 *interest on the national debt* will FAR EXCEED the total costs of SS AND Medicare put together.

4) Oh, yeah... by 2042 SS is also projected to have spent-down it's reserves and will be operating only on current cash inflows at, what?, some 72 - 74% of entitlements????

Now, gee... WHAT is the LARGEST problem???????

If we quit running annual federal deficits (ie: BALANCED the BUDGET now!), and fixed the cost-overrun slush fund that Medicare has become --- the vast majority of our federal financial problems would be handled... and we could *easily* move to the lesser issues of SS.]



To: Hope Praytochange who wrote (676661)3/24/2005 4:18:21 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Respond to of 769670
 
Report Emphasizes Shortfall in Medicare

By Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, March 24, 2005; Page A01

The two independent trustees overseeing Social Security and Medicare broke with the Bush administration's trustees yesterday, saying Medicare's financial problems far exceed Social Security's and are in urgent need of attention.

Republican Thomas R. Saving and Democrat John L. Palmer said Social Security's condition has changed little since they joined the Social Security and Medicare Boards of Trustees in 2000. But in the trustees' report released yesterday, they wrote that Medicare's prospects have "deteriorated dramatically" with rising medical costs and the addition in 2003 of a prescription drug benefit.

"The financial outlook for Social Security has improved marginally since 2000," wrote Saving and Palmer. "In sharp contrast, Medicare's financial outlook has deteriorated dramatically over the past five years and is now much worse that Social Security's."

The three trustees from the Bush Cabinet -- Treasury Secretary John W. Snow, Health and Human Services Secretary Michael O. Leavitt and Labor Secretary Elaine L. Chao -- chose to emphasize Social Security's problems almost exclusively at the report's release.

"The numbers leave nothing to doubt about the fundamental condition of the Social Security system," Snow said. "It's on an unsustainable course."

"The report speaks for itself," Leavitt said.

Unlike past years, though, neither Saving nor Palmer attended yesterday's report release. Treasury spokesman Robert S. Nichols said any attendees of the trustees' meeting that preceded the release were free to attend the news conference. Saving did attend that meeting.

But in an interview, Saving said the public trustees were purposely left out of the presentation.

"They didn't particularly invite us," he said. "They're doing it differently, I guess. It's not our call."

The independent trustees are appointed by the president, subject to Senate confirmation, and must come from different parties. Both Saving, from Texas A&M University, and Palmer, from Syracuse University, were appointed by President Bill Clinton. Saving has emerged as a strong supporter of Bush's plan to add private investment accounts to Social Security.

In their closing message last year, Saving and Palmer also emphasized Medicare's problems, but Saving said that this year, he and Palmer wanted to use their final report as trustees to further flesh out the changes they have seen over their tenure on the board. In so doing, they joined a chorus of policymakers worried that the political attention being lavished on Social Security may have found the wrong target.

"The question in my mind is why are we talking about saving Social Security?" said Bruce Bartlett, a conservative commentator with the National Center for Policy Analysis.

While Social Security benefits are scheduled to exceed tax revenue by 2017, Medicare's trust fund, which finances hospitalization of the elderly, reached that juncture last year. The trustees project the Social Security trust fund will be exhausted by 2041, one year sooner than projected last year. But Medicare's trust will be depleted more than two decades earlier, in 2020. Last year's report projected the Medicare trust fund exhaustion date to be 2019.

By 2024, Medicare's cost will have roared past Social Security's, Saving and Palmer wrote.

The government would have to put aside $11.1 trillion today to finance Social Security's promised benefits indefinitely, the trustees reported. But just the new Medicare prescription drug benefit included in the 2003 Medicare Modernization Act has an unfunded liability of $18.2 trillion projected out infinitely.

"The problem is, they've got the cart before the horse," Bartlett said of the Bush administration. "They've made Medicare vastly worse, and now they're saying to be responsible, we have to take on Social Security. It's utterly illogical."

Saving briefed Republicans on Capitol Hill yesterday, presenting data that showed Medicare's total unfunded liability at $65.4 trillion, almost six times Social Security's.
Saving strongly favors Bush's push to add private accounts to Social Security and said such accounts could be established to help young workers fund their health care in retirement, lessening the fiscal burden on Medicare. But he agreed with Bartlett that the administration had exacerbated Medicare's financial predicament with a drug benefit that was not paid for.

"The way to solve a problem in the future is not to add benefits to make it more underfunded," Saving said.

In the past five years, the date when Social Security would begin taking in less in taxes than it pays in benefits has actually slipped, from 2015 to 2017, the public trustees wrote, while the date of Social Security trust fund exhaustion has been pushed back from 2037 to 2041. Looking 75 years into the future, Social Security's cost, measured against the size of the economy, has also improved, from 6.8 percent of the gross domestic product projected in 2000 to 6.4 percent projected in yesterday's report.

In contrast, Medicare's financial outlook has deteriorated on all fronts. The year Saving and Palmer joined the board, Medicare's hospital insurance trust fund was projected to begin paying more in benefits than it collects in taxes in 2010. Instead, it reached that point last year. The point of trust fund exhaustion has moved up from 2025 to 2020.

Total Medicare expenditures are expected to approach 14 percent of the economy in 75 years, nearly the total tax take today. That is nearly triple the cost of Medicare projected in 2000.

"Medicare's costs are expected to grow at a much faster rate than those of Social Security," they concluded.

Snow and Leavitt said yesterday that the administration is focusing on Social Security because the 2003 Medicare law had measures to increase competition and bring down costs. But when pushed, Leavitt said, "I would do nothing to minimize the dilemma we face in the future with Medicare."

The savings from the law are not captured in the Medicare trustees report. It catalogues more than $1.1 trillion of costs from the new drug benefit through 2014 and an unfunded obligation of the government through 2079 of $8.7 trillion.

"Based on the report, Congress . . . needs to examine ways to make the Medicare program more effective," said Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa).

© 2005 The Washington Post Company