SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (226050)3/25/2005 6:30:51 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 1577864
 
Having said that, its well known in human psychology that when someone volunteers a piece of information inexplicably, the converse to that info is usually true.

1 - "Usually true" is an exaggeration.

2 - More importantly, in this case it wasn't inexplicable. The Dems have kept saying that Bush/the Republicans/"the neo-cons" are going to start up the draft. Now you get a report that talks about not-meeting recruitment goals. Its not like Bush and company just pulled the draft idea out of thin air in order to deny it. They had been accused of it. If you are accused of having certain plans, and you respond "No I don't plan to do that", it is not evidence that you do in fact plant to do what you are accused of.

we have some very definite military commitments in the world and the growing possibility of a troop shortage due to poor recruitment and lagging reenlistments. You do the math.

Missing recruitment targets aren't going to cause a draft to happen. To push through a draft we would have to have a need for a tremendous amount of extra soldiers. Increasing the army by 5% or something like that isn't significant enough. If we needed to double the army then maybe their would be a draft (but it would also take years to train and equip that many new soldiers if you were not cutting corners and giving them a lower standard of training and equipment then our current soldiers.)

Tim