Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suma who wrote (99395)	3/24/2005 8:08:03 PM
From: Grainne	Respond to of 108807

What a nice website, Suma. I don't think everyone is aware of how many fish species are dangerous to eat now. Thanks very much for posting it!

To: Suma who wrote (99395)	3/25/2005 1:56:59 AM
From: Ish	Respond to of 108807

<<Tracking the Bush Administration's Environmental Misdeeds Lost amidst the coverage of the year-long political battle is more definitive guidance for the average citizen about what she/he can do to minimize mercury's health dangers. All experts agree that the primary means of mercury exposure is through eating fish. The question many are asking is: what are the fish that pose the greatest health risks?>> I remember back in the 70s when a number of fly in lakes in Canada had warnings not to eat the fish because of the high level of mercury in them. Bush must have flown up there and poured the mercury into those lakes. The silly DNR thought the mercury came from natural veins of it under the lakes.