Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win Smith who wrote (159600)	3/24/2005 4:31:56 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

And what "special prosecutor" would that be, oh great legal mind? My understanding is that that law expired. Now all that's left is Tom DeLay pushing new rules to keep himself immune. That would be Patrick Fitzgerald. washingtonpost.com Fitzgerald's brief as special prosecutor is alive and well. Where did you get the idea that he no longer handles the case? Some crackpot website? It will be interesting to hear how you did. Perhaps another one of your many lapses in the facts and reason department. But what's new? The grand jury to which Fitzgerald is presenting evidence might eventually expire, though it is routine to get it renewed, so can't give you the benefit of the doubt should you be unable to tell the difference between a special prosecutor and a GJ. Uh, don't you get tired of being so wrong so much of the time? Does it, like, hurt?? And what does Tom DeLay have to do with Plame, Wilson, Fitzgerald, et al?