Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Grainne who wrote (99440)	3/24/2005 7:02:30 PM
From: Augustus Gloop	Respond to of 108807

That baby was going to die no mater what. We could have done everything (as I understand it) and the babies condition was terminal. The issue her is if Terri is in a vegetative state and there seems to be some disagreement on that. Either way her parents should have to pay the bill if they want custody

To: Grainne who wrote (99440)	3/25/2005 1:29:58 AM
From: Ish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

<<I know Texas passed a law when Bush was governor that allowed care to be discontinued if the patient or family could not pay--this law led to the death of a baby boy in Texas last week, over the objections of his family.>> I'd like to see some proof on this one. Know + Bush = something evil seems to pop up and becomes fact on the left rumor mill often. Finances didn't have anything to do with as I recall about the original post, more like a severely deformed baby with no chance of survival.