Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (8884)	3/24/2005 9:26:57 PM
From: Augustus Gloop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35834

I agree. Although I don't think Jeb and George should have entered the picture I do think that something is seriously wrong with starvation death. No - the state shouldn't pay to keep her alive Yes - her parents should be given custody of her and they can pay the bills. No - there isn't anything wrong with her husband moving on after waiting 7 years - my wife would want me to do the same and I would want her to do the same - thats love. Since we can't be sure of Terri's choice in the matter and since food isn't heroic medicine death by starvation is wrong. This isn't about religion.....this is about a young couple, who like most couples, had nothing in place because becoming a vegetable wasn't the first thing they thought about at 27. What amazes me is there is a portion of the starvation crowd that is more concerned about how we slaughter cattle than if this Gal dies a cruel death