SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Raymond L. Dirks Internet Research Tribunal Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rrufff who wrote (450)3/25/2005 12:12:09 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 544
 
RRUFF, this also was interesting.

In 2000, the SEC issued a cease-and-desist order barring Langley from participating in penny-stock offerings after his role in an alleged stock scam involving a Phoenix firm called Pollution Control International. Langley did not
admit or deny the SEC's findings.
usatoday.com

==============================================

Here is where i found out about the name change from Polution Controls to Scottsdale Cigar Subject 14867

==============================================

BCSC target Pacific International in new Mafia indictment
Canada StockWatch
by Brent Mudry
February 6, 2003
In the latest case of U.S. authorities chasing Mafia-linked clients of
Canadian brokerages, an associate of New York's Colombo organized crime family
and nine others have been charged with securities fraud and money laundering in
four penny stock pump-and-dump promotions through greased brokers. Eight targets
were arrested in predawn raids Thursday by the agents of the FBI and the U.S.
Postal Inspection Service in New York and Miami, while one was already in
custody and another is at large.
The United States Department of Justice claims the ring rigged four Nasdaq
promotions: Healthwatch Inc., Scottsdale Cigar Co. Inc., Clinical Aesthetics
Centre Inc. and Metro Global Media Inc.
In a superseding indictment unsealed Thursday in United States District
Court for the Eastern District of New York, authorities claim the alleged
fraudsters, several of whom are well known to Canadian regulators, used offshore
accounts at Mark Valentine's now defunct Bay Street brokerage Thomson Kernaghan
and Pacific International Securities, a controversial Howe Street brokerage now
in the midst of a landmark Canadian regulatory prosecution. Pacific
International spokesman and compliance director, Richard Thomas, who was unaware
of the Rizzo indictment until provided it by Stockwatch, declined immediate
comment, citing the current BCSC proceeding.
This latest indictment traces out the alleged co-conspirators of Francesco
(Frank) Rizzo, detained without bail since his Dec. 16 arrest on a criminal
complaint identifying him as an associate of the Colombo La Cosa Nostra, or LCN,
family. Mr. Rizzo, 43, of Glen Cove, N.Y., was arraigned on Jan. 31 on an
earlier securities fraud indictment in this case.
The nine new defendants include repeat securities violators Angel Luis
Lorie, 60, of Miami, and Gerard Burns, 54, of Scottsdale, Ariz., previously
identified by the British Columbia Securities Commission as star bad-boy clients
of Pacific International, Russian national Eugene Slusker, Glen Vincent Benussi,
and five brokers at Centex Securities, a now-defunct U.S. brokerage fond of
Vancouver deals: Douglas Alfieri, Louis Caesar Ceparano, David Brian Miller,
Frank Matthew Savasta and Peter Jason Worrell.
In the arrest operation, Messrs. Burns, Alfieri, 38, of East Rockaway, N.Y.,
Ceparano, 38, of Melville, N.Y., Miller, 30, of New York, and Worrell, 30, of
Syosset, N.Y., were arrested in New York and set for arraignment Thursday
afternoon by U.S. District Court Judge Joanna Seybert at the federal courthouse
in Central Islip, N.Y. Mr. Lorie, Mr. Benussi, 39, of Wellington, Fla., and Mr.
Savasta, 33, of Lantana, Fla., were arrested at their homes in Florida, and set
for initial arraignment in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
Florida before being shipped off to New York. FBI agents are seeking Mr.
Slusker, alias Gene Shuskar, 36, a Russian national last known to be in
Brooklyn, N.Y.
The arrests are the latest career achievements for Pacific International clients
Ms. Lorie and Mr. Burns, alias Gerald Burns, prosecuted together by the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission in 1997 for flogging $2.7-million
worth of worthless stock to Spanish investors. (Mr. Burns has also used other
aliases, including Leonard Thoubburon and Gerard Thoubburon.)
The Rizzo ring was gearing up around the time the SEC targeted Mr. Burns and Ms.
Lorie in for flogging worthless stocks to Spanish victims. On Sept. 30, 1997,
Ms. Lorie Burns and Diversified Capital Resources Inc., a Miami-based investment
banking company she headed and controlled, were barred by a federal judge in
Florida from "recklessly offering or selling securities" and from acting as
unregistered broker-dealers.
The same day, the SEC barred Ms. Lorie from participating not just in any penny
stock offering, but also from the securities industry in general. The lifetime
ban included acting as a promoter, finder, consultant, or other person who
engages in actions with a broker, dealer or issuer for purposes of the issuance
or trading in any penny stock, or inducing or attempting to induce the purchase
or sale of any penny stock.
The SEC complaint, filed Sept. 29, 1997, claimed Mr. Burns and Ms. Lorie sold
$2.7-million worth of share of VDS Enterprises Inc., based on false financials
filed with the regulator. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.) The victims were
told that VDS had acquired a garbage business in Venezuela, its anticipated
annual revenues of $45-million to $50-million, it had assets of $16.43-million,
shareholders' equity of $14.75-million and service contracts for $100-million,
none of which was true. In October, 1998, Mr. Burns was barred from acting as an
officer of director of a public company, fined $100,000 and ordered to pay
disgorgement of $2.7-million.
Ms. Lorie did not keep her nose clean for long. The SEC targeted her again in
August, 2001, when it filed an action charging her, American Healthcare
Providers Inc., her son and three others in an Internet market manipulation
scheme. The SEC claims the group made at least $1.47-million in illicit profits
by pumping American Healthcare stock through bogus press releases and Internet
chat site postings. The stock endured a 10-day SEC suspension in June, 2000,
after the company falsely announced a major contract with a New York health
program.
Mr. Burns is no stranger to handcuffs. He went to prison in May, 1988, on fraud
charges stemming from the sale of unregistered securities, and was released in
December, 1991. More recently, he and partner David Rowe were the key figures in
the Cambridge International Bank and Trust debacle, an offshoot of Van Brink's
First International Bank of Grenada prime bank scheme.
Mr. Burns and Mr. Rowe, investigated by the BCSC, the FBI, the SEC and numerous
state securities regulators, were arrested in March, 2001, in the Cambridge
case, a prosecution led by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District
of California. The Cambridge indictment claims Mr. Burns and Mr. Rowe raised at
least $30-million from more than 300 investors in the U.S. and Canada., and the
scheme involved accounts at Vancouver brokerage Union Securities, First Heritage
Savings Credit Union, in the Vancouver suburb of Langley, and Lines Overseas
Management Ltd. in Bermuda.
In the latest unflattering revelations about Mr. Burns, the current indictment
claims he and Mr. Slusker, the Russian on the loose, secretly owned portions of
Centex Securities, a brokerage, based in the San Diego suburb of La Jolla,
Calif., recently shut down by the National Association of Securities Dealers.
(Mr. Slusker also controlled a Centex account in the name of A.K. Arthur
International Co.) The Rizzo ring operated out of Long Island, N.Y., branches of
two dubious national brokerages, both since shut down, Centex and Jaron
Equities.
The new indictment is especially embarrassing for Canadian brokerages Pacific
International of Vancouver and Thomson Kernaghan of Toronto.
Pacific International is in the late stages of a lengthy precedent-setting
hearing by the BCSC, which claims the brokerage had the misfortune of attracting
and servicing far more than its Howe Street share of penny stock crooks,
securities violators, criminals and other riff raff. The Canadian regulator
launched its prosecution in July, 2001, in the wake of Stockwatch reporting
numerous U.S. indictments and SEC prosecutions featuring Pacific International
as an alleged stock and money laundering conduit for Mafia associates and other
securities violators.
Shalom Weiss, recently extradited from Austria to Orlando, Fla., to start an
845-year prison term leads a list of 14 dubious clients noted by the BCSC in its
notice of hearing, followed by Mr. Burns and Ms. Lorie. While Pacific
International has not yet opened its defence at the BCSC hearing, it is expected
to argue that despite allegations in FBI, SEC, U.S. Justice Department and other
regulatory documents, Mr. Weiss and Mr. Burns were never clients of the
brokerage.
Thomson Kernaghan was shut down last summer by the Ontario Securities Commission
and the Investment Dealers Association of Canada, largely stemming from numerous
dubious transactions involving its head, Mr. Valentine. In the week following
the OSC action, Stockwatch unveiled many dubious penny stock deals which caught
the interest of Mr. Valentine and his brokerage.
Mr. Valentine is currently under house arrest with electronic monitoring in
Florida, after waiving extradition in the wake of his Aug. 14 arrest at
Frankfurt's airport as a key target of Operation Bermuda Short, a two-year joint
RCMP-FBI undercover sting targeting 60 North American penny stock players for
agreeing to bribe a mutual fund manager or to launder funds for a Colombian
cocaine cartel. While legendary shorter Mr. Valentine and his Bermuda-based
offshore front Paul Lemmon inspired the name Bermuda Short, Mr. Lemmon has since
pled guilty and agreed to rat on Mr. Valentine.
The current indictment claims the Rizzo ring conspired to commit securities
fraud through dealings at Jaron and Centex in New York, and from additional
locations in the Miami area, and conspired to launder more than $2.6-million of
their illicit profits, between March, 1997, and May, 1998. Messrs. Rizzo,
Benussi, Burns, Slusker and Lorie alleged gained control of large blocks of
free-trading shares of Healthwatch, Scottsdale, Clinical Aesthetics and Metro
Global, with the assistance of the indicted Centex brokers and unindicted
unidentified Jaron brokers.
"The defendants used bank and brokerage accounts in the United States, Canada
and the Channel Islands of Guernsey in the United Kingdom to launder
approximately $2.6-million in proceeds from the fraudulent sales of these
stocks," states the U.S. Justice Department.
The targeted penny stocks performed quite well under the magic spell of the
Rizzo ring, under the plug was pulled. Scottsdale Cigar shares peaked at $5.37
in December, 1997, then plummeted to 44 cents by March, 1998. Shares of Clinical
Aesthetics peaked at $10 in November, 1997, before falling to 50 cents by the
following March. Metro Global shares doubled to $4 in January, 1998, then
abruptly fell to $2.50.
Alas, these stocks were hardly blue chip material and required hefty 30-per-cent
kickbacks to interest the Centex brokers.
The indictment notes that Ms. Lorie, operating out of an office in Miami, used
nominees to open foreign brokerage accounts. These included accounts in the
names of VISP SA and Southcross Ltd. at both Thomson Kernaghan in Toronto and
Pacific International in Vancouver. (A Howe Street source suggests the
indictment may be partially incorrect, as Pacific International never handled an
account in the name of VISP SA.)
Mr. Burns allegedly controlled trading of the targeted penny stocks at Centex.
"He also controlled trading of the companies' stock deposited into the 'VISP SA'
and 'Southcross Ltd.' brokerage accounts established by the defendant Angel Luis
Lorie at Thomson Kernaghan and Pacific International," states the indictment.
Mr. Berussi, who acquired the office space used to house a Centex branch at
Valley Stream, N.Y., controlled accounts at Centex and Barclays Bank PLC in the
name of Barson's Holdings. He allegedly used the Barclays account and an
offshore account in the name of Rum Ltd. at Bank of Butterfield in Guernsey as
conduits to secretly transfer the proceeds of penny stock sales at Jaron and
Centex to a bank account controlled by Mr. Rizzo, the Colombo Mafia associate,
in the name of Emerald Security Consultants Inc. at Chase Manhattan Bank.
"Defendants GERARD BURNS, ANGEL LUIS LORIE, GLEN VINCENT BENUSSI and EUGENE
SLUSKER established domestic and foreign brokerage accounts, including the VISP
SA and Southcross Ltd. accounts at Thomson Kernaghan and Pacific International,
the Barsons brokerage account and the A.K. Arthur account to execute prearranged
trades of stock in, among other companies, Scottsdale Cigar, MGMA (Metro Global)
and CLES (Clinical Aesthetics) between these accounts, all for the purpose of
artificially inflating trading volume in these stocks, generating market
interest in these stocks, and fraudulently converting securities into cash by
selling these stocks to members of the investing public that were led to believe
that the companies had services and assets in excess of their true value,"
states the indictment.
The indictment also claims Mr. Rizzo, Mr. Benussi and Mr. Slusker, "together
with others whose identities are known to the Grand Jury," hired brokers at
Jaron and Centex, including defendants Messrs. Alfieri, Ceparano, Miller,
Savasta and Worrell, to use "manipulative and deceptive practices" to
artificially boost the stocks through a series of rigged trades.
"It was a further part of the conspiracy that the defendants FRANK RIZZO, GLEN
VINCENT BENUSSI, GERARD BURNS, ANGEL LUIS LORIE AND EUGENE SLUSKER paid,
promised to pay and caused others to secretly pay DOUGLAS ALFIERI, LOUIS CAESAR
CEPARANO, DAVID BRIAN MILLER, FRANK MATTHEW SAVASTA and PETER JASON WORRELL,
among other brokers, cash kickbacks and other forms of compensation
substantially in excess of ordinary brokerage commissions, amounting to
approximately 30 per cent of the sales they made of the Companies' stocks, to
induce them to sell the Companies' stocks."
Among other things, the dirty brokers forgot to tell their sucker clients about
their kickbacks, which included an $1,150 watch Mr. Savasta received. In
January, 1998, Mr. Rizzo, Mr. Burns and all the other defendants except for Ms.
Lorie, traveled to Las Vegas for some sort of a shindig. The indictment notes
the brokers were greased with a number of the bribes on Feb. 6, 1998, and Mr.
Alfieri, apparently a stickler for detail, prepared a list a week later of the
outstanding kickbacks owed to him and his five fellow Centex brokers for
flogging the stocks.
All defendants, of course, including Mr. Rizzo, Mr. Burns and Ms. Lorie remain
presumed innocent until proven guilty. If convicted however, they face maximum
sentences of five years in prison for conspiracy to commit securities fraud, 20
years for money laundering, fines of up to twice the illicit profits gained, and
civil forfeiture of up to $2.6-million in real and personal property involved in
the money laundering or traceable to the money laundering conspiracy.



To: rrufff who wrote (450)3/25/2005 10:41:52 PM
From: Sidney Reilly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 544
 
Naked short selling STILL alive and well

antandsons.com

antandsons.com

"How can the DTC do their job and be clear of all conflict of interests if most of the board members are affiliated with big broker-dealers?"

That list of names exposes the whole scam in a nutshell. I had another thought while I was reading the articles. When I buy a BB stock and the DTCC "loans" the MM the shares to deliver to my account, counterfeit shares btw, no shares have been removed from the float. The DTCC has the shares on their books as loaned and the MM is supposed to settle that loan but what if he never does. Because, the shares I bought are fake and the float was not reduced the pps never goes up because buying will never move the price. Only the MM can move the price. And he only moves the price up when there's a string of suckers with money waiting to buy counterfeit shares because of some news or other event. Then the buying eases especially if the company is not strong and he can move the price down again. Down far enough so I am losing money and give up on the stock and sell. But by selling I have settled the MM's "fail to deliver" position FOR HIM!!! I am suckered in and out of the stock, the DTCC collects, the MM collects and I lost money as well as settled the MM's naked short position for him!! What a scam. They are creating shares out of thin air and selling them to us, the suckers. And then we give them back at a loss and settle their books for them!! They should all be shot.



To: rrufff who wrote (450)9/22/2005 6:56:55 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 544
 
HDTV/Ray Dirks: "The only sell-side analyst who appears to be following SpatiaLight, Ray Dirks of Dirks & Co., says he reached operating earnings per share estimates of $2 for 2003 and $6 for 2004 by assuming a gross margin of 40%. But Dirks admits that figure may be optimistic."
===============================================
Spatialight Inc says SEC opens informal probe
Thu Sep 22, 2005 6:51 AM ET

NEW YORK, Sept 22 (Reuters) - Spatialight Inc. (HDTV.O: Quote, Profile, Research), a maker of high-definition video panels, said on Thursday it was cooperating with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in an informal inquiry.

Spatialight said it had been advised by the staff of the SEC of the inquiry, which would focus on the filing of consents of independent accounting firm BDO Seidman, LLP, without requisite authorization.
© Reuters 2005. All Rights Reserved.
==================================================

HDTV: What's Wrong With This Picture?
By George Mannes
Senior Writer
01/15/2002 10:50 AM EST
URL: thestreet.com

Shares in the high-definition television technology company SpatiaLight (HDTV:Nasdaq - news - commentary) have more than tripled since late September.

But unlike the sharp pictures the company hopes to create on a grand scale, the logic behind the company's breathtaking run-up is fuzzier than the picture from a 1959 DuMont.

Late last year, SpatiaLight -- one of several companies developing a TV picture technology known as liquid crystal on silicon, or LCoS -- announced deals to sell LCoS products to three different China-based TV manufacturers. SpatiaLight Chairman Larry Matteson says these deals represent potential revenue of $70 million for the company in 2002 and a total of $400 million over the next three years.

The company appears to have hit some synergistic hot buttons, appealing to the investing public as a play on both HDTV, the next generation of television technology, and the colossal Chinese consumer market. SpatiaLight's stock jumped from $1.78 in early October as high as $8.15 earlier this month. But that's a modest climb to some: One sell-side analyst has anointed the stock with a one-year price target of $30 and a two-year of $100.

Despite a pullback Monday that sent the stock down $1.44, SpatiaLight was still generously priced Monday night, with its $5.79 closing price implying a market capitalization of $139 million. The stock traded Tuesday morning at $5.99, up 20 cents.

Not bad for a company with revenue totaling $167,400 since the beginning of 1998; with $66,000 cash on hand at the end of September; with losses of $7.2 million for the first nine months of 2001 alone; and, finally, blessed by a "going concern" letter from its accountants that casts doubt on the company's ability to stay afloat.

Moreover, the "potential revenue" numbers the company has issued seem more hypothetical than certain, given SpatiaLight's technical challenges, competition, and economic assumptions. For starters, the company expects that an LCoS-based HDTV set will sell in China for $3,500 -- 75% more than the maximum that most Americans pay for their sets, and more than three times China's per-capita annual income.

"This is just straight, bloody, venture capital," says an investor who has shorted SpatiaLight's stock, speaking on condition of anonymity. "It's pure concept. And it's not even a concept where you're selling into a proven marketplace."
Rear Projection

For an orderly look at the SpatiaLight story, let's work our way backwards from the end product: the $3,500 HDTV sets which SpatiaLight says companies plan to build and sell in China using SpatiaLight's LCoS panels.

The sets at issue are known as rear-projection sets. Like the more common glass-tube sets, rear-projection sets come in a self-contained box. But unlike typical TVs, which make a picture by shooting electrons onto a glass tube, RP sets use visible light, not electrons, to shoot a picture onto a plastic screen with the help of a sort of internal movie projector.

Traditionally, these visible-light projectors have used miniature picture tubes, but SpatiaLight and numerous other companies are developing new models based instead on miniature TV screens known as microdisplays.

Experts say a $3,500 set is too expensive for the consumer market. And that's in the U.S. Over the years, selling prices of television sets have crystallized around a number of prices, says Gerry Kaufhold, principal analyst in multimedia at the market research firm Cahners In-Stat Group. For RP sets, those prices are $1,200 for low-end models and $2,000 for HDTV-quality units; above $2,000, most sets are sold as part of custom-installation home theater packages, with the set representing only part of the cost, he says.

Those stickers would cause a lot more shock in China, where in 2000 the market intelligence firm Asia Pulse found that the market was dominated by sets selling for less than 2,000 yuan -- about $241 at today's exchange rates.

SpatiaLight's Matteson declines to question his manufacturing customers' expected retail price of $3,500 per set. "They feel confident it's the right price," he says. "I'm not in that business."
Light Sabers

After $3,500, the next puzzling number on the SpatiaLight tour is the average $1,600 in revenue that the company says it will gain when it sells each "light engine" -- a package comprising three of the company's proprietary LCoS microdisplay panels, associated optics and necessary electronics.

By one RP industry participant's rule of thumb, multiplying the light engine's price by 2.5 gives you the total bill of materials for the set -- in SpatiaLight's case, $4,000. By another participant's rough estimate, the wholesale price of an RP set should be three times the light engine's cost, marking it up to $4,800 for dealers. By either thumb, the $3,500 price -- as costly as it might be to the consumer -- seems optimistically low, given the light engine's cost.

The Chinese set manufacturers, says Matteson, "were satisfied with the economics of the deal we worked out together." SpatiaLight maintains that the Chinese government is making the development of high-definition TV broadcasting and manufacturing a key economic and technical priority. In fact, SpatiaLight competitor Three-Five Systems (TFS:NYSE - news - commentary) set up an engineering and manufacturing facility in China four years ago, and is itself working with two different government-sponsored HDTV companies. Says SpatiaLight's Matteson, "China will be in our view the first major market for HDTV sets, not the U.S."

Yet even if the $1,600 revenue-per-light-engine figure holds, investors may underestimate how much of that money is retained by SpatiaLight, not paid out to contractors like Fuji Photo Optical, which manufactures SpatiaLight's light engine. The only sell-side analyst who appears to be following SpatiaLight, Ray Dirks of Dirks & Co., says he reached operating earnings per share estimates of $2 for 2003 and $6 for 2004 by assuming a gross margin of 40%. But Dirks admits that figure may be optimistic.

"If some of that goes to Fuji, we have to reduce it," he says. Matteson won't talk details, but he says, "It turns out optics are a substantial part of the total cost." Dirks has a strong buy on the company; his firm hasn't done banking for SpatiaLight, and he has no holdings in the company.
Yet So Far Away

The final challenge facing SpatiaLight is whether it can even meet the production and sales targets it has publicized, given the competion and extraordinary execution risk it faces. LCoS competes with several other technologies in the nascent HDTV RP market. Other players -- Texas Instruments (TXN:NYSE - news - commentary) , for one -- are clearly better funded than SpatiaLight.

Other LCoS developers for RP applications appear to be closer to commercial production than SpatiaLight, or have shipped more microdisplays (though not necessarily for the RP market). Privately held DisplayTech, based in Colorado, says it shipped its millionth LCoS microdisplay in December. LCoS chips developed by Three-Five Systems were used in high-end TV sets that Thomson Multimedia (the marketer of RCA brand gear) and Samsung displayed at the recent Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas.

Asked about SpatiaLight's light-engine production volumes, Matteson says the company has a "limited number" of prototypes it has used for "serious customers."

As for execution, LCoS development -- which has translated into zero RP sets on the market today -- has proved devilishly difficult. That's a point worth remembering when one sees SpatiaLight's disclaimers that its sales forecasts are subject to "performance criteria" and "technical specifications."

"Where SpatiaLight is right now is really more of handshake to try to go forward," says Chris Chinnock, senior editor of the Microdisplay Report covering microdisplays and the projection industry. "There are so many milestones that they're going to have to hit between now and real production, and so many places to go wrong. ... Moving from a few prototypes to manufacturing is a huge step."

In other words, going from zero to $70 million in a year is highly indefinite.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------