Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Gold and Silver Stocks and Related Commentary -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Condor who wrote (9447)	3/25/2005 11:59:20 AM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 18308

<What would you consider very good drill results Claude?`> Anything with a grams-meters greater than 200 is very good. Between 100 gm and 200 gm, I consider the result to be good. Below 100 gm they are encouraging. Above 300-400 gm they become excellent...and so on. Ex. - 50 meters of 4 g/t gold - 75 meters of near 3 g/t gold - 100 meters of 2 g/t gold - 200 meters of 1 g/t gold These are very good results. Of course, the closer to surface is the intercept and the higher is the grade, the better it is. Ex. 50 meters of 4 g/T gold from surface down is much better than 200 meters of 1 g/t gold from 100m below surface to 300m below surface. also 200 meters of 1 g/t from 500m below surface would not be very good. But 50m of 4g/t gold could be good. etc. It also depends on how many holes with good results and how far apart are the holes. In other words, there are a lot of factors that will help you conclude if the results are good or not. And we are not yet including other factors like metallurgy, topography, infrastructure....