Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Castle -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (4655)	3/25/2005 2:48:15 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 7936

If people who are strict constitutionalists argued that congress or the president should get heavily involved then it would be hypocrisy but I don't think most Republicans are really strict constitutionalists. How many republicans are calling for eliminating a large array of popular government programs for constitutional reasons? When was the last time you heard Republicans (or Democrats for that matter) argue against a new social program because it constitutional basis was unclear or unsound? Also I think this goes beyond pointing out hypocrisy. Its more an example of "whatever method might work so that I win this case", and itself is at least as hypocritical as the Republican's actions. Tim

To: Lane3 who wrote (4655)	3/29/2005 7:59:42 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7936

Complementary Goods In the box with my TaxCut software, a coupon for Prilosec. marginalrevolution.com