SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (226378)3/26/2005 12:06:16 AM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573086
 
"Spending or tax cuts... what does the Congressional Budget Office think -"

John, John, John. You are making the mistake of trying to be "reality based". It is much better to stick to the theoretical or ideological based arguments. Because being "reality based" means you might have to change your mind if things don't break your way. That is clearly unacceptable. That means you are "wishy washy". Admitting you might have not known the correct path is a sign of weakness. If you are pure of heart, then you don't have weaknesses, do you?

Get with the program. I know you have been sent the memos, don't you read them?



To: Road Walker who wrote (226378)3/29/2005 5:30:07 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573086
 
You aren't making any new argument, or even presenting any new facts. You are presenting 1 - Someone else making the same argument that you have already been making, and 2 - Providing more detail about the facts that you have already presented.

The idea that the level of federal revenue is down as a percentage of GDP has not been disputed. Hammering away at the same already agreed to point is useless.

Tim


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News