Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Yogizuna who wrote (106048)	3/26/2005 12:01:36 PM
From: D. Long	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793711

I am extremely suspicious of this spouse Whether you are suspicious of the spouse or not is irrelevant. It is objectionable on policy grounds to be second guessing spouses. It is not our business, and not the business of the State. Marriage includes a bundle of legal assumptions, one of which is that a husband is the legal guardian of his incapacitated wife. The State, IMO, has no place interfering in that relationship without good cause. Mere suspicions or the ignorant casting of aspersions on one's marital relationship are not good cause. This case has been litigated to death, the judge has more facts than he a mere mortal can probably sift through in a year, and the judge came down on Shiavo's side. Let it go, for crying out loud. Derek@sickofitall.blah