SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Senomys(SNMX)- A Taste for Success!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DewDiligence_on_SI who wrote (4)3/26/2005 3:46:47 PM
From: Arthur Radley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 192
 
You ask if events at DNDN and GTCB make SNMX a better investment....I don't know so why don't you tell me since you always have the answers. Like I'm pumping a stock and you aren't in Post #15952 on the Biotech Valuation thread. How soon you forget how your were taken to task with your pumping on that thread.

Dew..arrogance and fifty cents will get you a cup of coffee at McDonald's. So have a nice visit there and when you get a chance tell me about another of your penny stocks. Not that you would pump such a wise investment vehicle!



To: DewDiligence_on_SI who wrote (4)3/26/2005 4:25:40 PM
From: Arthur Radley  Respond to of 192
 
Dew..lets bury this hatchet right now!! My interest in SNMX is tied to my concern about the unhealthy eating habits we have in this country. Something has to be done about this issue, as pointed out in this article..http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,148666,00.html

I must admit that I took exception to your LOL comment, but would welcome any constructive comments on the merits or demerits of the company. You accused me of pumping the stock...and I readily admitted that I own shares in the company, when it appears that you have no reservations in talking about stocks that you own. I just found it ironic that you offer up LOL for SNMX when it is at an all time high in share price and your favorite stocks are at 52 week lows.

So again...constructive comments are welcome and I will take back that I said you were a complete &^%$###))(*&&^%%. (:>)