To: American Spirit who wrote (40030 ) 3/29/2005 1:04:26 PM From: Srexley Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 173976 "These are all true statements." Another lie. Confirmed by your own words. Let's take a look dishonest spirit. "1) Before 2000, gasoline prices were roughly half." No they were not. Your own words "maybe not exactly" confirm it. So it is a LIE (can't clame stupidity). "2) Reagan's economy was a mixed bag. Before he took office interest rates were way into the double digits (my first car loan was at 21%), unemplyment was SKY HIGH and inflation also was at or near double digits. ALL considerably better after Carter was shown the door. Another LIE. "3) Reagan is one of many forces which ended the Cold War" Certainly was. The biggest without a doubt. But you said it was a lie, which is a lie. Hippies and The beatles had little to do with the collapse, and if hippies had their way Reagan's plans would not have gone into effect. Nothing against hippies, but they did not cause the collapse. Hippies in many cases actually like communism, or at least socialism. "4) Bushies would love to invade Iran." Blatant lie here. Bushies would love to have Iran go democratic (as MANY MANY Iranians would). I think he will do it without a shot being fired. But then you will lie and say he had nothing to do with it. This is the mean spirited hatred that makes people like you soooooo hateable. Only other haters like the dishonest haters. "5) FBi confirms Michael Moore underestimated the amount of Bin Laudens and Saudis Bush let out of the country on 9-13." None flew out while airspace was closed, which is what Moore stated. Like you always do when you don't have an answer, you switch the topic. Nobody has denied that some saudis left the country after 9-11. If I was in OBL's family, I would have bolted too. "6) Bush indeed used family influence to get out of military duty. Only a blind fool would disagree. Therefore Rather's premise was correct..." So your "proof" is that "Only a blind fool would disagree"? You are more of a dishonest a-hole than I thought. And finally there is your absurd statement "Therefore Rather's premise was correct". This, based on your razer sharp analysis "Only a blind fool would disagree" is what a hard news story is. Completely discounting the FACT that the documents used to prove the story were fake. But you say the documents are only "questionable". Another LIE. You're such a dishonest dirt bag you will not convince anybody of anything. Other haters will revel in your mean spirited and dishonest attacks against our President, but more and more are seeing that your type of attack is un-American, and is hurting the demo party. Badly. Pathetic.