SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (7687)3/29/2005 12:41:24 PM
From: rrufff  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
Why should there be a burden of proof? If we make the markets fair for all, why should crusaders object?

As the cry is just too persistent, it adds to the suspicion that there is something hidden.

Certainly, there is more public awareness in 2005. As I've suggested, the political process is the way for this to go. The SEC seems too bogged down in its own world and the courts are not equipped to handle this type of issue.

The issue is not going away.



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (7687)3/29/2005 2:03:40 PM
From: Mighty_Mezz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
USXP was the nude shorting poster child for a while, until the SEC sued, did a share audit, then the DOJ opened a criminal investigation.