Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcos who wrote (159830)	3/30/2005 8:47:25 AM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

do you mean more diverse genes within each individual, or that the continent has more diversity in the form of genetically distinct ethnic groups The latter. Groups within Africa have more genetic diversity with each other than do all other groups outside of Africa. It should also be noted that Chimps show this effect even more so, while being geographically more restricted yet. Don't know that anyone has a really definitive answer for this, although the default one is that the groups have been genetically isolated although geographically close for a long time. oh boy, you'd want to be careful where you stated that in México Yes, they're doing quite well. Much better than the Native Americans from the Northwest locally. The Reconquista (sp??) is pretty spectacular, and another example of winning from beneath so to speak. The Caribs, and many N & S Americans didn't do so well. ... and he's black, real black - jamaican Have you ever watched the movie "Mr. Johnson"? If not, please do so. There was one line that had me rolling on the floor. "We Englishmen..." The context was beautiful.