SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elroy who wrote (227077)3/30/2005 4:02:04 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573957
 
They "went dry" on the project because Gibson wanted complete artistic control on a movie whose subject Hollywood determined did not have broad market appeal. Hollywood does that all the time.......

They coughed up $40 million to make "Ishtar".

Somehow, they got probably $25 million to make "Dude, Where's My Car?!".

I find it hard to believe the subject matter of "The Passion of the Christ" has less mass appeal than "Dude, Where's My Car?!"......


To answer that question you have to look at the most important demographic to Hollywood. Its males between the ages of 16 and 25. That is not the demographic for Passion of the Christ. It is the demographic for Dude, where's my car? Its no more complex than that.

ted



To: Elroy who wrote (227077)3/30/2005 9:10:15 PM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573957
 
>Somehow, they got probably $25 million to make "Dude, Where's My Car?!".

That movie rocked!!!

>I find it hard to believe the subject matter of "The Passion of the Christ" has less mass appeal than "Dude, Where's My Car?!"......

Remember, before he decided to finance the movie himself, he was going to put it out without subtitles... that's pretty darn risky for a studio to take on.

-Z