Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (16264)	3/30/2005 5:09:03 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

There are some tantalizing pieces of evidence that the core was demolished. There were survivors from most floors of the first building and all floors of the second. If there had been a group cutting up the central core I suspect that someone would have reports of unusual 'maintenance' activities. Your 'pancake' theory requires that nearly every floor had been cut apart without anyone noticing. It seems unnecessary too, since the top of the building that began the pancake process was plenty heavy and could easily have done a number on the core one the collapse process began. Supporting evidence is that the second building, with the heavier top, fell first and it fell exactly beginning where the airplane hit which would have been a difficult guess for whoever was dismantling the core. This sounds again like a Karl Rove distraction to keep people from investigating real mysteries, such as why no planes were put up to intercept any of the hyjacked planes, and why the flight 93 fell apart in the air. TP