Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (677756)	3/31/2005 3:31:12 PM
From: JDN	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Wishful thinking on your part. Democratic party is headed toward the trash heap of history, get used to it. jdn

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (677756)	3/31/2005 4:32:52 PM
From: Sedohr Nod	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Your 84% poll question is a bit flawed. I agree that Terri had the right to die, but there is little that happened in this case "legally" that I find agreeable. If custody in this case couldn't be settled in court to the satisfaction of the parents, then where would you suggest they turn? Clearly, there is room for doubt when a spouse has moved on with life. If the law says differently, then it needs more work politically. Show me a poll where 84% personally would take the option to die with "dignity" while starving to death. If that is the only option available, then it needs more work, again politically.