Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (677807)	3/31/2005 7:21:44 PM
From: TideGlider	Respond to of 769670

Frankly Kenneth I don't see your reasoning as Mr. Schiavo would not have suffered a grievous loss that demanded due process. Mr. Schiavo claimed his losses previously. According to him Terri was already gone. He was compensated for that as well. The only one subject to grievous loss in the scenario was the family and Ms. Schiavo herself. That is where the system failed. I also don't see Mr. Schiavo having an argument encompassing equal treatment as he is only a witness in the case petitioning the court for what he claimed was Terri's wish. After declaring what he claims Terri's wishes to be he availed himself of access to the courts and in further review would have the same opportunity. I don't think you are correct on that. Perhaps Jallen or one of the attorneys is best to comment to that. That process is a denial of "due process" and "equal protection of the laws" for Mr. Schiavo.