SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: goldworldnet who wrote (677808)3/31/2005 4:51:16 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Respond to of 769670
 
LOL!



To: goldworldnet who wrote (677808)3/31/2005 4:52:23 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Last year, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld told the Senate Armed
Services Committee that he had viewed the contents of three
compact disks containing "blatantly sadistic, cruel, and
inhuman" acts of torture and abuse committed by some U.S.
personnel at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.

Almost none of those images have been released into the public
domain, and they may never be if the government has its way.

The Pentagon's successful efforts to deflect Freedom of
Information Act requests for disclosure of the images -- with
identifying features obscured if necessary -- are traced by Matt
Welch in the latest Reason Magazine.

See his article "The Pentagon's Secret Stash: Why we'll never see
the second round of Abu Ghraib photos," Reason, April 2005:

reason.com



To: goldworldnet who wrote (677808)3/31/2005 4:53:12 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
The arrogant abuse of power was by Congress. The last decision in the Circuit Court of Appeals recognized the unconstitutionality of the Congressional Act.



To: goldworldnet who wrote (677808)3/31/2005 4:55:51 PM
From: Wayners  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Everybody focus's on the high crimes and misdemeanors section of the Constitution when it comes to impeaching judges. People completely miss the section where it says judges can continue serving as long as their behaviour is good. Bad behaviour isn't crimes, its a way to impeach judges for bad decisions or making decisions outside the law or playing the role of the legislature or the states on their own.