Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (67463)	3/31/2005 11:08:01 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

Didn't we just have one before Bush?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (67463)	4/1/2005 8:59:58 AM
From: GVTucker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

mindmeld, RE: I have to agree with you, Lizzie. Bush and friends are in bed with oil. Oil money is part of the package that got him re-elected. He's not liable to do anything drastic to reduce oil consumption during his last term in office. I hate to say it, because I'm a Republican, but we need a tree-hugger Democrat in office for 8 years to spearhead us off the oil dependence, if we're ever going to have a chance at it. Sigh. It isn't too long ago that people were accusing W's dad of pushing the price of crude down to increase demand. The #1 best way to reduce demand for crude is high prices. We're getting that. Everything else will be taken care of by the market. It always does with commodities, and crude oil is still a commodity.