SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sully- who wrote (9065)4/1/2005 10:42:31 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Felos: serial ghoul, new-age charlatan

Patterico's Pontifications
Filed under: General Schiavo Scum— See Dubya @ 2:35 pm

The Junkyard Blog takes a big bite out of Michael Schiavo’s creepy lawyer George Felos. JYB quotes at length from a review of Felos’ book in the Florida Baptist Witness (which was, incidentally the publication which rode herd on Judge George Greer’s handling of the case, causing him to withdraw from his Baptist Church in Clearwater.)

Here’s an excerpt from Felos’ book
, 'Litigation as Spiritual Practice', in which he writes about one of his previous victclients, Estelle Browning:

<<<

Although feeling like I could drift into sleep, I also experienced a sense of heightened awareness. As Mrs. Browning lay motionless before my gaze, I suddenly heard a loud, deep moan and scream and wondered if the nursing home personnel heard it and would respond to the unfortunate resident. In the next moment, as this cry of pain and torment continued, I realized it was Mrs. Browning. I felt the mid-section of my body open and noticed a strange quality to the light in the room. I sensed her soul in agony. As she screamed I heard her say, in confusion, ‘Why am I still here … why am I here?’ My soul touched hers and in some way I communicated that she was still locked in her body. I promised I would do everything in my power to gain the release her soul cried for.
>>>

Yeah, the “mid-section of my body” just about opened up when I read that, too. Bryan Preston of JYB says this sounds like something “Crossing Over” author and “psychic” John Edward would say. Actually, it sounds a lot like something Senator John Edwards did say in a courtroom, “channeling” the death of a baby girl in her mother’s birth canal:

<<<

“She speaks to you through me,” the lawyer went on in his closing argument. “And I have to tell you right now — I didn’t plan to talk about this — right now I feel her. I feel her presence. She’s inside me, and she’s talking to you.”

>>>

Senator Edwards was shown no quarter from the right-leaning blogosphere for that maudlin bit of mesmerism. Neither should Felos be spared ridicule for his. While it’s fun to bash the demonstrative excesses of the religious right, and doing so makes its practitioners look so sophisticated, let’s all remember there are ridiculous mystical quacks running things on the other side. Not only that, Felos admits to operating on direct and exclusive spiritual revelation from an incapacitated woman. That is exactly the sort of thing that scares people about the religious right: personal, prophetic visions driving policy. But if you like the policy, is the prophecy OK?

A little more on Felos later. But I have to know, did he bill the client’s estate for that astral consultation? Cause I know a lot of first-year associates are reading this and going “hmmm….”


patterico.com

junkyardblog.net

calvarybaptist.org

nytimes.com



To: Sully- who wrote (9065)4/2/2005 12:07:12 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Answering Some Frequently Asked Questions About The Terri Schiavo Case

*** Note: There's an enormous amount of conflicting information floating around about the Terri Schiavo case. So in an effort to clarify some of the particularly controversial points, I took the time to do some heavy research.

While I have a very strong opinion about this case, I consulted numerous sources on both sides of the issue & tried to be as fair and balanced as possible. ***

When and how was Terri Schiavo injured? On February 25, 1990 Terri Schiavo collapsed. There is controversy over what happened.

The theory most often bandied about is that Terri had bulimia which led to a potassium imbalance, which in turn led to a heart attack. The malpractice suit that Michael Schiavo won was based on this diagnosis. That fact that Terri lost a large amount of weight in the months before her attack contributes to the credibility of this theory.

On the other hand, the Schindlers have speculated that Michael Schiavo may have caused Terri's injuries by trying to strangle her and neurologist William Hammesfahr, who has worked with the Schindlers on this case has denied that Terri had a heart attack:

"In the Emergency Room, a possible diagnosis of heart attack was briefly entertained, but then dismissed after blood chemistries and serial EKG's did not show evidence of a heart attack."

libertytothecaptives.net

Personally, I find it a little hard to believe that Michael Schiavo could win a malpractice suit that turns on his wife having a heart attack if the hospital denied that she had one. So while there are certainly differing opinions on this issue, I'd have to lean towards the more popular explanation for her injury.

------

Was Terri Schiavo beaten by her husband? Here's an adequate summary of the allegations & Michael Schiavo's response by Newsmax:

"A March 1991 bone scan performed on Mrs. Schiavo showed evidence of "compression fractures" to her back, ribs, legs and ankles. Prior to being found unconscious in her St. Petersburg apartment the year before, Schiavo had not broken any bones, her friends say.

Jackie Rhodes, who worked with Terri at a local insurance office, said she often showed up at work with noticeable bruises - but never complained of being hit.

"They were smaller bruises, like maybe someone had grabbed her or, you know, like, squeezed her arm or leg really tight," Rhodes told Fox News Channel last week, adding that the couple were planning to divorce.

During a 2002 court hearing, Michael Schiavo took issue with allegations that he abused his wife prior to the accident that ended her normal life.

"I've never, ever struck a woman, especially my wife," he insisted, in quotes picked up by the Tampa Tribune. "I was raised better than that."

Mr. Schiavo blamed physical therapists for Terri's injuries, saying that doctors who performed the 1991 bone scan knew that bone loss caused by her paralysis made her susceptible to injury during the therapy sessions.

He called the abuse allegations "utterly ridiculous."

You can take a look at the actual bone scan here.

earnedmedia.org
newsmax.com

Here's more on the spousal abuse claim from WorldNetDaily:

"In testimony given during the 2000 trial, Terri's girlfriend and co-worker said Terri discussed getting a divorce and moving in with her. She also testified that the couple had a violent argument on the day of Terri's collapse, which prompted her to urge Terri to not stay at home that night – a suggestion Terri disregarded.

"There are only two people who know what happened that night that she collapsed. And one of them is trying to kill the other who is too disabled to speak," (the Schindler's lawyer Pat Anderson) told WND at the commencement of the trial last month.

worldnetdaily.com

While it is certainly understandable that this might raise suspicions, without further corroborating evidence like police reports, hospital visits prior to February 25, 1990, or perhaps friends who claim Terri Schiavo told them she had been physically abused, it seems a bit irresponsible to carelessly toss around wife-beating allegations at this point.

------

Did Michael Schiavo provide rehabilitation for his wife? Initially, by all accounts, Michael Schiavo did provide rehabilitation for his wife. However, there is debate about how long the therapy was continued.

According to the Terri Schindler-Schiavo Foundation:

"Terri hasn't had meaningful therapy since 1991, but many credible physicians say she can benefit from it."

terrisfight.org

On the other hand, according to the Kansas City Star:

"Terri underwent more than three years of rehabilitative therapy after her collapse in 1990."

kansascity.com

Whatever the case may be, serious attempts at rehabilitation don't appear to have been made in over a decade.

------

Has Michael Schiavo dated other women since his wife's injuries? Yes. In a late 1993 deposition, Michael Schiavo admitted that he had engaged in 2 intimate, romantic relationships with women other than his wife. Assuming those were the only two relationships he had, and given their length (3 & 8 months), he must have begun dating a little less than two years after Terri's injury.

terrisfight.org

Here's another interesting snippet from that same November 1993 deposition that some people might find telling. The answers here are being provided by Michael Schiavo:

Question: What did you do with your wife's jewelry?

Answer: My wife's jewelry?

Question: Yeah.

Answer: Um, I think I took her engagement ring and her -- what do they call it -- diamond wedding band and made a ring for myself.

Question: Okay. Anything else? Did you make any other jewelry for yourself?

Answer: No, just that.

Question: What did you do with her cats?

Answer: Her cats were put to sleep on the advice of my mother-in-law.

Currently, Michael Schiavo lives with his fiance, Jodi Centonze. They've lived together for a decade and have had two children together.

------

What happened to cause the split between Michael Schiavo and the Schindlers? At first, the Schindlers and Michael Schiavo got along extremely well:

"They moved in together after Terri's collapse in February 1990, and Michael called the Schindlers ''Mom and Dad.'' A year later, the Schindlers encouraged their son-in-law to get on with his life and date. They even met some of the women he saw (*** Note: The Guardian Ad Litem report also confirms the Schindlers encouraged Michael to date ***).

''I looked at that as maybe he was starting to take a step in the right direction and get his life back together,'' Bob Schindler said in a 1993 deposition. ``He's still a young man. He still has a life ahead of him.''

timesleader.com
nationalreview.com

But things changed in early 1993 and they had a bitter falling out over the money won in the malpractice suit and Terri's rehabilitation:

"Michael initially expected a multimillion-dollar award, and the Schindlers said he promised them a share, which would enable them to care for Terri at home.

By then, the Schindlers were almost broke. After selling his share of a successful industrial equipment company, Bob Schindler lost his savings in a Florida business venture that went sour. The couple declared bankruptcy in 1989, Bob Schindler testified. He told a court that Michael Schiavo promised to help.

But Michael said he never committed to sharing any award money with the Schindlers, especially when the award ended up being far smaller than hoped. Roughly $700,000 was earmarked for a trust fund for Terri, and $300,000 for Michael.

The Schindlers still expected part of Michael's share to help care for Terri. On Valentine's Day 1993, they confronted Michael in Terri's hospital room. The discussion quickly turned ugly. Michael said the Schindlers demanded the money, so he lied and said he did not have it. Disgusted, the Schindlers left, their trust in Michael irrevocably breached.

''The fact that he was going back on his word upset me,'' Bob Schindler testified in 1993. ``I was devastated.''

Michael soon began believing doctors who told him that Terri had effectively died in 1990. In a 1993 deposition, he testified that Terri had said she would never want to live by artificial means. He imposed a ''do not resuscitate'' order. Hospice staff challenged the order's legality, so he reversed it.

timesleader.com

From that point on, Michael Schiavo and the Schindlers became bitter enemies.

------

Did Terri Schiavo say she wanted to die if she were in this condition? This is one of the primary points of contention in this case and with good reason.

Initially, as mentioned earlier, Michael did provide rehabilitation for his wife. Furthermore, in late 1992, Michael Schiavo said the following during testimony given in his medical malpractice suit:

"I believe in the vows I took with my wife, through sickness, in health, for richer or poor. I married my wife because I love her and I want to spend the rest of my life with her. I'm going to do that."

terrisfight.org

But, in 1993 (Note: this is after Michael Schiavo had already started dating other women and received over a million dollars from the settlement of the medical malpractice suit), his attitude changed rather dramatically.

Michael Schiavo admitted in a November of 1993 deposition that earlier in the year, he had requested that doctors not treat a urinary tract infection that was potentially fatal to Terri. The doctors were not able to comply with Michael's request because it would have been illegal.

terrisfight.org

According to the The Times Leader, Michael Schiavo first claimed that Terri had told him she wouldn't want to live at this point, but most other sources that I've seen point to that information first being revealed in 1998.

timesleader.com

In 1998, Michael said that while watching a movie, Terri had once opined that she wouldn't want to live if she were ever in a coma. Michael's older brother, Scott Schiavo, and Michael's sister-in-law, Joan Schiavo also claimed Terri had a similar conversation with them after a funeral.

On the other hand, one of Terri's friends, Diane Meyer, had a very different story to tell:

"Diane Meyer can recall only one time that her best friend, Terri Schiavo, really got angry with her. It was in 1981, and it haunts her still.

The recent high school graduates had just seen a television movie about Karen Ann Quinlan, who had been in a coma since collapsing six years earlier and was the subject of a bitter court battle over her parents' decision to take her off a respirator. Meyer says she told a cruel joke about Quinlan, and it set Terri off.

"She went down my throat about this joke, that it was inappropriate," Meyer says. She remembers Terri saying she wondered how the doctors and lawyers could possibly know what Quinlan was really feeling or what she would want.

"Where there's life," Meyer recalls her saying, "there's hope."

edition.cnn.com

Added to that is the testimony of Terri's court appointed guardian, Richard Pearse:

"Pearse said he was troubled by the fact that Michael waited until 1998 to petition to remove the feeding tube, even though he claims to have known her wishes all along, and that he waited until he won a malpractice suit based on a professed desire to take care of her into old age. As her husband, Michael would inherit what is left of her malpractice award, originally $700,000, which is held in a trust fund administered by the court. Accounting of the fund is sealed. But Michael's lawyer, George Felos, said most of it has been spent on legal fees associated with the custody dispute.

Pearse also said he did not find Joan and Scott Schiavo's testimony credible."

newsday.com

Believe it or not, there's even more:

The Schindlers had contacted a woman Michael dated in 1991 who told them Michael had confessed to her he did not know what Terri would want. Although the woman refused to sign an affidavit, it bought the Schindlers some time. And with it, they found Trudy Capone.

A former co-worker of Michael's, Capone signed an affidavit on May 9, 2001, stating "Michael confided in me all the time about Terri ... He said to me many times that he had no idea what her wishes were."

Despite the rather large amount of conflicting evidence, Judge Greer ruled in Michael Schiavo's favor on the issue.

newsday.com

------

Is Terri Schiavo in a persistent vegetative state? This is of course, the key issue in the case because if Terri Schiavo is judged to be in a PVS, she can be legally denied food and water. On the other hand, if the diagnosis is that she's minimally conscious, the law requires that she be given food and water no matter what the wishes of her guardian may be.

There's also quite a bit of controversy over what her condition actually is and with good reason.

According to the New York Times:

"At least six neurologists have examined Ms. Schiavo, and in affidavits or testimony four of them agreed that she was in a persistent vegetative state and highly unlikely to recover."

nytimes.com

The flip side of this argument is that there are many qualified experts who disagree with that diagnosis. Florida neurologist William Hammesfahr & neurologist William Cheshire of the Mayo Clinic have gotten the most attention in the last week, but based on the videos that have been made public, 33 physicians (including 15 board-certified neurologists) have signed affidavits stating that Terri's condition should be reevaluated.

terrisfight.org
worldnetdaily.com
nationalreview.com

Combine those conflicting diagnoses with the fact that Terri Schiavo has never had a MRI or a PET and the fact that the error rate in diagnosing PVS has been reported to be as high as "43 percent," and it's clear that there is still more than a little room for doubt about her true condition.

worldnetdaily.com

John Hawkins

rightwingnews.com



To: Sully- who wrote (9065)4/3/2005 4:05:59 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35834
 
AN HONEST SCHIAVO POLL

By Michelle Malkin
April 03, 2005 12:20 PM

In my March 23 column, I wrote: "Imagine how the poll results might have turned out if ABC News had made clear to participants that Terri is not terminally ill."

Well, no need to imagine any longer. A new Zogby poll suggests that if Americans knew the details of the Schiavo case they would not have supported removing her feeding tube.

Lifenews.com reports:

<<<

Polls leading up to the death of Terri Schiavo made it appear Americans had formed a consensus in favor of ending her life. However, a new Zogby poll with fairer questions shows the nation clearly supporting Terri and her parents and wanting to protect the lives of other disabled patients.

The Zogby poll found that, if a person becomes incapacitated and has not expressed their preference for medical treatment, as in Terri's case, 43 percent say "the law presume that the person wants to live, even if the person is receiving food and water through a tube" while just 30 percent disagree.

Another Zogby question [bears] directly on Terri's circumstances.

"If a disabled person is not terminally ill, not in a coma, and not being kept alive on life support, and they have no written directive, should or should they not be denied food and water," the poll asked.

A whopping 79 percent said the patient should not have food and water taken away while just 9 percent said yes
.
>>>

Hat tip: David Limbaugh, whose blog post title says it all: Now they tell us.

***
Will Franklin has more and concludes: "When people learn the actual facts of the case, the consensus for death turns on its head."


Previous/related: Pat Caddell on predetermined polls. Kaus's take.

michellemalkin.com

townhall.com

lifenews.com

davidlimbaugh.com

willisms.com

homepage.mac.com

slate.msn.com



To: Sully- who wrote (9065)4/3/2005 10:45:47 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Starvation Not So Popular After All

Power Line

You likely have already seen this somewhere else, but just in case, Zogby has some poll data on the Schiavo case that are quite different from what other pollsters have reported. In particular:

<<<

"If a disabled person is not terminally ill, not in a coma, and not being kept alive on life support, and they have no written directive, should or should they not be denied food and water," the poll asked.

A whopping 79 percent said the patient should not have food and water taken away while just 9 percent said yes.
>>>

That's obviously a fairer way of describing Terri Schiavo's situation than most polls used.


The only thing that bothers me about the Zogby data is that I haven't been able to find the complete poll results anywhere; even Zogby's own site only has a "Life News" story about the poll. If anyone has a link to the complete data, let us know.

Posted by Hindrocket

powerlineblog.com



To: Sully- who wrote (9065)4/4/2005 7:03:52 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
I wonder why the MSM has spiked this Zogby poll?

Starvation Was Never an Option For Informed Americans

Scared Monkeys
By Red on Main

When will the American public understand that polls can be misleading and in many cases when there is an agenda, flat out wrong and a misrepresentation of reality? There was always something inherently wrong when I saw the polls that stated a majority of Americans wanted to see Terri Schiavo die. I did not believe that American’s who were informed on the subject and if asked intensionally non-misleading questions would want Terri to die. I knew better, but was perplexed by the results of a what we know now was an agenda driven poll.

It appears that David Limbaugh and Michelle Malkin felt the same. Happy to know that I am in good company. We then are presented with a new poll from John Zogby that shows what most of us already knew in our minds.


<<<

The Zogby poll found that, if a person becomes incapacitated and has not expressed their preference for medical treatment, as in Terri’s case, 43 percent say “the law presume that the person wants to live, even if the person is receiving food and water through a tube” while just 30 percent disagree.

Another Zogby question his directly on Terri’s circumstances.

“If a disabled person is not terminally ill, not in a coma, and not being kept alive on life support, and they have no written directive, should or should they not be denied food and water,” the poll asked.

A whopping 79 percent said the patient should not have food and water taken away while just 9 percent said yes
.
>>>

Isn’t it a novel concept that when people are asked a direct question that pertains to a specific situation they answer differently than vague and leading questions designed to evoke a preordained answer.

Look at yet another poll question and how it was answered. Much different than what was consistently told to us by the MSM, shame on them.


<<<

When asked directly about Terri’s case and told the her estranged husband Michael “has had a girlfriend for 10 years and has two children with her” 56 percent of Americans believed guardianship should have been turned over to Terri’s parents while 37 percent disagreed.
>>>

The MSM is at it again and this time their purposeful misrepresentation of the fact let to Terri’s death being an accepted fact. After her death we find out differently, as David Limbaugh said, “Now They Tell Us”

Let me be the first to say … All of who took part and were behind this charade to sway public opinion and that of law makers, GET READY FOR OUR BACKLASH IN 2006 and 2008.


scaredmonkeys.com

davidlimbaugh.com

michellemalkin.com

zogby.com



To: Sully- who wrote (9065)4/8/2005 5:33:07 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 35834
 
This is unfreaking-believable if this is true!!!!!

Here we go again

Patterico's Pontifications
Filed under: General Schiavo
See Dubya @ 3:44 am

We’re picking up speed down a slippery slope, and I fear we burned out the brakes trying to save Terri Schiavo from destruction. From Fr. Rob Johansen, emphasis mine:

<<<

The similarities of Mae Margourik’s situation and Terri Schiavo’s are obvious: Once again we have a family divided over what care should be given to a seriously ill relative. And once again, we have a judge playing God with someone’s life. But what is different, and in a sense worse, is that Mae is being deprived of food and water in clear contravention of her own stated wishes, and at the request of someone who should have no standing under Georgia law.

God help us.


(h/t: the Dawn Patrol.)

UPDATE: The granddaughter says “She has glaucoma and now this heart problem, and who would want to live with disabilities like these?”

Well, I for one would prefer it to the alternative, and apparently, judging by her CLEARLY WRITTEN LIVING WILL expressing a desire NOT TO BE TAKEN OFF LIFE SUPPORT, so would Mae Magourik.


patterico.com

thrownback.blogspot.com

thrownback.blogspot.com



To: Sully- who wrote (9065)4/17/2005 1:07:06 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Dean Vows To "Use Terri Schiavo"

Power Line

Howard Dean said yesterday that the Democrats would use Terri Schiavo as a weapon against the Republicans in 2006 and 2008, according to the Los Angeles Times:

<<<

Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean said Friday that his party would wield the Terri Schiavo case against Republicans in the 2006 and 2008 elections, but for now needed to stay focused battling President Bush on Social Security.

"We're going to use Terri Schiavo later on," Dean said...

"This is going to be an issue in 2006, and it's going to be an issue in 2008," Dean told about 200 people at a gay rights group's breakfast in West Hollywood, "because we're going to have an ad with a picture of Tom DeLay saying, 'Do you want this guy to decide whether you die or not? Or is that going to be up to your loved ones?' "

Dean, a practicing physician until he became governor of Vermont in 1991, added: "The issue is: Are we going to live in a theocracy where the highest powers tell us what to do? Or are we going to be allowed to consult our own high powers when we make very difficult decisions?"
>>>

Dean's characterization of the issues involved in the Schiavo case is of course twisted beyond all recognition.
But his comments bring two thoughts to mind.

First, I very seriously doubt that the Schiavo case will be an issue either in 2006 or in 2008.

Second, why is it it that when a minor Republican staffer wrote that the Schiavo case was a "great political issue," it was a scandal that was reported in every newspaper in America, whereas, when the Chairman of the Democratic National Committee says, "We're going to use Terri Schiavo" in the 2006 and 2008 elections, the response is a yawn? I'm sure there must be a reason why Dean's comment is different, but offhand I can't think what it is.

Dean has a unique ability to put his foot in his mouth, from which the Republicans will continue to reap benefits as long as Dean holds his present position.


Posted by John

powerlineblog.com

latimes.com



To: Sully- who wrote (9065)4/24/2005 8:09:55 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
My Position on the Courts and Terri Schiavo

javascript:doLoadf(52,7783765,1120260)
Filed under: Schiavo Government— Patterico @ 12:03 pm

Recently, someone rarely acquainted with the truth accused me of disagreeing with every lawyer in the country about the Schiavo case. Rather than debate the issue with him, I thought I’d make my position clear here.

First, as regards the initial (pre-Congressional involvement) litigation, I have expressed serious doubts regarding the soundness of the factfinding done by the probate judge – in particular on the topic of Terri Schiavo’s wishes. I have documented one specific and crucial error he made in the factfinding process. Even putting that aside, I just don’t see how the quality of the evidence presented to the probate judge rises to the level of “clear and convincing” – especially given the conflicts of interest Michael Schiavo had.

The state appellate judges simply deferred to the probate judge on that issue, as appellate courts generally do.

As regards the law passed by Congress, I believe that the federal courts were wrong not to re-insert the tube while they considered a constitutional argument that I believe to be strong. I have explained at length my reasons that I believe the courts got it wrong. I am joined in this view by two judges from the 11th Circuit, including a highly respected judge named Gerald Tjoflat. I may also be joined in that view by several Supreme Court Justices, since the Court’s decision not to grant certiorari indicates nothing about the Justices’ view of the merits.

My views on the Schiavo case are well-documented. Any honest person who disagrees with my legal analysis of the federal courts’ rulings is welcome to weigh in on the relevant thread (linked above), which has garnered almost 200 comments so far – not one of which has raised a convincing argument that my analysis is wrong. I’m still waiting . . .

patterico.com

patterico.com

patterico.com



To: Sully- who wrote (9065)6/15/2005 6:37:28 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Schiavo Autopsy Released

By Rob on Default
Say Anything

<<<

LARGO, Florida (AP) — An autopsy on Terri Schiavo backed her husband’s contention that she was in a persistent vegetative state, finding that she had massive and irreversible brain damage and was blind, the medical examiner’s office said Wednesday. It also found no evidence that she was strangled or otherwise abused.

But what caused her collapse 15 years earlier remained a mystery. The autopsy and post-mortem investigation found no proof that she had an eating disorder, as was suspected at the time, Pinellas-Pasco Medical Examiner Jon Thogmartin said.

Autopsy results on the 41-year-old brain-damaged woman were made public Wednesday, more than two months after her death March 31 ended a right-to-die battle between her husband and parents that engulfed the courts, Congress and the White House and divided the country.

She died from dehydration, Thogmartin said. He said she did not appear to have suffered a heart attack and there was no evidence that she was given harmful drugs or other substances prior to her death.

He said that after her feeding tube was removed, she would not have been able to eat or drink if she had been given food by mouth, as her parents’ requested.

“Removal of her feeding tube would have resulted in her death whether she was fed or hydrated by mouth or not,” Thogmartin told reporters.
>>>

That should put to rest some of the more off-the-wall theories surrounding the Schiavo matter. Those who accused Michael Schiavo of abusing Terri should probably apologize.

It doesn’t do a thing to alleviate my two biggest problems with the matter, however.

To me, her brain capacity was never an issue. The fact of the matter was that, outside of needing food and water, her body was still living. In the absence of any sort of definitive answer as to her wishes for the situation she found herself in I could not support her death. Unfortunately, in the absence of a definitive answer for a situation like that, this country allows for its courts to make the decision instead. The courts in Florida ruled that she should die as it was in their authority to do so.

I agree with allowing the courts to rule in situations where the body is being kept alive by life support, but that wasn’t the case with Terri Schiavo. Unless you consider food and water life support. I don’t.

My other problem with this was the way she was allowed to die. When the court made the decision to let her die she should have been given a massive dose of morphine to ease her into the here-after. Instead, she was allowed to dehydrate over the course of several days. Nobody should be forced to go through that regardless of how brain-damaged they are.

sayanythingblog.com

cnn.com