Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (160014)	4/1/2005 8:27:29 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

So how do we know that? A: because we invaded. No invasion, no knowledge. Every intelligence agency would still be looking at the signs and saying: boy, Saddam is hiding his stuff well, but we know from his behavior that he has to have it. Just as they did say before 2003. Go read the reports from the time, stop reinventing history in the light of hindsight. You're as bad as GST, who demands President ignore the information they get from the CIA if and only if it later turns out to be wrong. Comparing the secrecy levels of the Bush administration to those of Stalinist police state is the height of absurdity. Next you'll be telling me that Bush is feeding his critics into chippers. Could have verified whether WMD were there by doing the inspections. Inspectors were pulled out so the invasion could proceed. Premature ejaculation...as it were. Orca