Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win Smith who wrote (160030)	4/1/2005 9:45:39 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Nadine is not interested in facts. They simply get in the way of her pretty little invasion and war to bring democracy to the middle east, while securing a huge supply of oil for her SUV. Orca

To: Win Smith who wrote (160030)	4/1/2005 10:48:08 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Respond to of 281500

Yes, Iraq turned out not to contain the stocks that intelligence had thought it had. But - and I know this point seems very hard for you, Win, so read it carefully - due to Saddam's long history of lying about his weapons and non-cooperation with the inspections, the only way Duelfer knows what he reported is because Saddam was overthrown and Duelfer had free access to Iraq. If Saddam was still in power, Duelfer would not know for sure what Saddam had, but would still work on the assumption that Saddam hadn't decided to beat his swords into plowshares. There. Was that too hard for you? Or are you going to sneer some more about my intellectual honesty?