Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (7761)	4/3/2005 12:11:30 AM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12465

Kevin, Look at your posting history. Whether it's me or someone else posting, you post that there is no such problem and just ask for examples. It's a bogus question because hedge funds are secretive by nature and don't want their scams to be open to the public. That's why I've advocated thorough and open investigations, probably by Congressional committee. Let's not take an apologist's word for it. Let's see if there really are manipulative activities being done, including naked shorting, abuse of loopholes by MM's, use of international trading desks, etc. How could anyone object to that? Let's expose the truth. Perhaps you will be proven right. What are you afraid of? Geof posts the Sedonna case and you turn it around claiming it's one type of activity or something and the company was probably or maybe was or could have been involved. Deflection, typical of an apologist. It's ok if you are paid to defend hedgies or MM's. Just don't get your panties so bunched up. Your responses are getting more and more treble as you repeat yourself. Just as the guru defenders were blinded to the possibililty that there would be a guilty verdict, it may very well be that they are blinded or rather trying to put blinders on others with respect to the issues raised. How many posts did you leave here claiming that there was no criminality, no manipulation? You were wrong then but couldn't accept it and you're wrong IMO on these issues.