Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (31702)	4/5/2005 4:12:29 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90947

Have you ever seen a medical matter where more than one doctor is involved where there WEREN'T multiple opinions? Yes....I have. J.

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (31702)	4/5/2005 4:48:22 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 90947

A close family friend a few years ago was basically in the same state as Terri, in his case from advanced Parkinson's rather than an injury. In his case his wife decided not even to insert the feeding tube (he had been sustained by IV solutions, but that is apparently only a temporary measure), but had him brought home and gave him no nutrition or hydration, and he died peacefully, as far as I could tell, about ten days later. He was never left alone; when his wife had to sleep friends came in to be with him. If a feeding tube had been inserted at the care center he could have lasted probably for years. Was it murder not to insert the tube? Was it murder to take out the IV and let him die at home? If not, why does that differ from Terri's case?