Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (155029)	4/6/2005 5:42:55 PM
From: pgerassi	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Ephud: Yes You lie by your own definition, "It requires a willful intent to mislead". You have intentionally taken many things with the intention to mislead and been caught at it many times. One of the more "lies" is that AMD is not demand limited, but has "bad yields". Yet Intel has suffered recently what must be "bad yields". They have plenty of idle capacity as stated by Barrett. Yet they are short of Sonomas. They must have scheduled plenty of wafers to produce the required amount, yet they are well short of whet they thought they would get. The only answer that fits is that they suffered from a "yield crash", far lower than expected saleable bin splits from the supposedly excellent Intel fabrication process(es). Your using AMD's supposedly "bad yields" to move attention from Intel's "bad yields", "poor designs" and "poor management". You did the same when Prescott turned out to be quite late, too hot and too slow. You are doing more misleading in claiming that Intel did not commit illegal acts in Japan (and elsewhere). You seem to do an awful lot of misleading, enough to show that it is intentional and thus, making you a "liar" by your own definition. So stop throwing baseballs at other peoples houses as they seem to bounce off and wreck your own glass house. Pete