To: tejek who wrote (228034 ) 4/6/2005 11:25:53 PM From: Peter Dierks Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1571053 Pelosi Ethics problems are an ongoing problem. This from November Dem memo may violate ethics rules By Hans Nichols and Jonathan E. Kaplan Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) leadership team has instructed Democratic lawmakers to use committee resources for partisan purposes, providing state-by-state data on campaign topics from job losses to highway funding. In an Oct 15th email obtained by The Hill, Melissa Skolfield, Pelosi’s communication counsel, urged Democratic staff to use state-by-state data generated by the Transportation Committee’s minority staff in the “crucial” coming weeks. October’s communication blitz blurs the distinction between political and legislative activities. House rules allow congressional staff to issue reports that further legislative goals but forbid the use of official resources on overtly political causes. Pelosi’s office said that directing Democratic lawmakers to use these committee reports in the waning days of the election does not violate ethics rules. But independent ethics watchdogs say that Pelosi’s instructions to use committee resources raises many questions. “Even though she is being somewhat subtle about it, it’s clear this is about the election,” said Larry Noble, executive director for the Center for Responsive Politics. “It’s a fair question to ask if taxpayers’ dollars should be spent for this kind of political activity. On the other side, we saw Bush Cabinet officials out on the campaign trail.” Skolfield countered, “This is part of a two-year effort to point out the harmful effect of Republican policies on American families. We have been aggressive about highlighting the difference between Democrats and Republicans every week and during every recess.” Democrats say Republican communications shops and committees do much of the same. “Perhaps the ‘biggie’ is simply that we are being effective,” said a Democratic leadership aide. “The Republicans have got to be frustrated that none of our incumbents outside of Texas are polling below 50 percent. “We provide local data. We provide sample press releases. We help them get on radio and TV. And yes, we work with committees to issue reports. I’m not sure we are doing anything differently from [GOP Conference Chairwoman ] Deborah Pryce’s [R-Ohio] shop, but I am certain that we are doing it better. And we’re well within the rules.” Greg Crist, spokesman for Pryce, said the House Republican Conference has an aggressive outreach program for lawmakers but “we primarily rely on the administration to provide a government-based statistics, facts that can easily be verified.” Crist allowed that majority staff members on committees provide GOP lawmakers with resources that could be used as political fodder. He rejected the contention that the Democrats’ message machine worked better. “If the only message I had was founded in bogus committee reports with cooked numbers, I’d call that a success, too,” Crist said. “Look at [Rep. Henry] Waxman’s [D-Calif.] material on Medicare and prescription drugs. It’s called data mining. It’s wrong, and it’s misleading.” Democrats said Republicans have been using nonpartisan committee resources for partisan advantage throughout the 108th Congress. Most recently, they accused Resources Committee Chairman Richard Pombo [R-Calif.] of misusing the House’s franking privilege. Less than two weeks before today’s election, Rep. Chris Cox (R-Calif.), chairman of the Select Committee on Homeland Security, released a glossy white paper that described the successes in the war against terrorism and amounted to a ringing endorsement of the Bush administration’s anti-terrorism efforts. Ken Johnson, a committee spokesman, said “Freedom Defended: Implementing America’s Strategy for Homeland Security,” a 46-page document sent to reporters and think tanks, had “nothing to do with the election, but everything to do with making a solid case for permanency” of the committee. Rep. Jim Turner (Texas), the committee’s ranking Democrat, said that he did not have a chance to preview the report but “the need for the committee’s permanence has been well-established.” The report’s narrative begins with the terrorist attacks against the United States on Sept. 11, 2001, and moves swiftly to “The Bush Offensive,” on Page 8, and on Page 13 to a section headlined “The President Seizes the Initiative.” The report argues explicitly that the Homeland Security Committee be made permanent, on Page 45. Democrats have not hesitated to use the platform of the Homeland Security Committee to criticize the Bush administration in the weeks before the election. In a letter to department Secretary Tom Ridge yesterday, Turner criticized rail security. On Oct. 25, Turner released a report on bioterrorism that argued that states and local governments remain unprepared to distribute medicines and vaccines in case of an attack. And a week earlier, he slammed the shortcomings in the homeland-security spending bill. “I think you can take [Cox’s] report and lay alongside the work product we’ve done on the Democratic side and judge for yourself,” Turner said. “We have issued 13 reports and introduced 11 pieces of legislation. Many of those bills flowed from the report we had prepared. We have tried to be diligent and done the kind of work that should be expected of an oversight committee.” hillnews.com