SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: olivier asser who wrote (3058)4/8/2005 12:52:59 PM
From: avawava  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3143
 
Personally I would be pretty "sue happy" if I had been able to squeeze 300K or so out of all these defendants over the past couple of years. And to date you have not even had to prove that anybody did anything illegal or even unethical. Actually, as best I can tell from your thread(s), it took you almost 2 years just to figure out that Berber and Moor live in Texas and must be sued there, where the court has jurisdiction over them.

I am sure that any settlements made (assuming you are telling the truth) were based on cost of defense issues and the hassle factor of having a crazy man in their life, rather than any reflection of the "truth". You are always speaking of this "widespread racketeering" and "vast conspiracy" yet it has been 5 years since the Cyber/Schawb deal, if this was so, then it would have come to light by someone other than/in addition to you. You know somebody, a disgruntled former employee, a class action hungry lawyer, the SEC, etc. You are the only one shouting this story. You, the only one who has a vested economic interest in keeping the ball rolling and the "settlements" coming.

By the way when are you going to distribute the "settlement" money with all of your fellow daytraders that you claim to be fighting for? Or do you first have to recover the 10 million dollars you were dumb enough to lose in the first place?